User talk:Cheltolly

Speedy deletion of "Botanical Hair Care"
A page you created, Botanical Hair Care, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. Sceptre (talk) 23:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Botanical Hair Care
A tag has been placed on Botanical Hair Care requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Cheltolly (talk) 23:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC) This is the first time ive added anything to Wiki so im playing it by ear. Basically, the FACT in this 'piece' is the FIRST introduction of Californian-formulated 'private label' products into the UK. Surely thats a Wiki item of interest? Last year, the Hair Industry (another Wiki page which doesnt exist!) was the biggest growth market in the UK and the 'private label' market is the new and up and coming option in a business saturated with Tigi, etc. I see John Paul Mitchell Systems has a Wiki Page and theres less relevance in that Wiki page. Perhaps the title could be better and the ingredients bit could be taken off (put that on just expand it a bit). Is this page better as a stub?..although im not really sure what a stub is as im new to this. Cheltolly (talk) 23:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)