User talk:Chemical Engineer

Welcome, ! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions! You might like to check out our tutorial, a resource created especially for new users like yourself. You also may want to introduce yourself to the community at the new user log. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or at our questions forum. I hope very much you enjoy being here with us, and I wish you luck with your contributions. - zappa.jake at

Image
Would you please add some image in Chemical engineering. I've added an image from another article. As you are professional engineer please try to expand the article. Thank you. Tanvir che (talk) 17:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Because chemical engineering covers such a vast range and is actually an abstract (we design processes, other people make the objects which operate the processes) I have some difficulty in thinking what would be suitable. For personal reasons, I do not wish to make use of images from my professional work. Chemical Engineer (talk) 18:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Why Jimmy's?
Do any of your sources explain just why the hospital was named after St James? (Was it a local church? Which of the umpteen Saints? etc!). Just wondered if you might know as you've just added to the article. Cheers, PamD (talk) 16:03, 21 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Not yet. I have only had a quick delve in the library while shopping. I plan to do some more Leeds local history this Summer. Chemical Engineer (talk) 16:07, 21 June 2008 (UTC)


 * And as you will see, I have now found who the two Jimmies were and added this to the article. Chemical Engineer (talk) 19:41, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Karol Adamiecki and Gantt
I've added refs to the relevant articles, showing that Adamiecki was indeed the originator of an idea. It just goes to underline that if you don't publish in English (or at least German or French), you might as well not bother... (see also Michał Kalecki for another example).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 20:28, 22 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Przepraszam,

I believe you are confusing priority with cause. The Michał Kalecki page is also special pleading rather than NPOV. What tends to happen is that at a certain stage in culture, different people have similar ideas because they are looking at the same problem. Do your reference books specifically state how Henry Gantt got to hear of Adamiecki's unpublished work and then stole it? If so, it is legitimate to say the Gantt chart is a modified Harmonogram. If they just assert it or note it was around earlier, then it is a slander on Gantt. I was about to write (based on the Marsh article which I have) what the harmonogram was and how it was superior, but I don't think I'll bother now. (And why does the Polish Wikipedia not have a decent article on the harmonogram?)Chemical Engineer (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)


 * You can read the linked book excerpts yourself (I have provided Google Book links to specific pages) and decide whether they support this formulation (as I believe they do). I have used English sources, I could look for some Polish ones that may go into the details (and I have not bothered with Google Scholar yet, but I can, if you want me to). Why is Polish Wiki worse? Well, it has fewer editors to work on it. PS. I have c/e the articles; it is indeed not correct to imply any form of plagiarism with the refs at hand. What they do support is that Adamiecki invented the idea but did not popularize it in the West. It is not clear whether Gantt knew of Adamiecki's work or not (it would be interesting to go to his publications and look whether he mentions Adamiecki anywhere), but he popularized it and it is attributed to him.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 20:49, 22 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Don't agree. They indicate independent invention on the pages you cite.  Only the first reference (is the author by any chance of Polish origin?) in any way asserts they are the same, but does not give a reason on the page you cite. I stand by my statement that (for the purposes of an encylopedia entry) the most which can be confidently said is that the Harmonogram is similar to the Gantt chart.Chemical Engineer (talk) 21:15, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Feel free to rewrite the sections, we will see if it is better. Also, if you do create the article on harmonogram, we can see if it is a better invention than the Gantt chart or not.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 22:09, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Arthur B. Metzner
A tag has been placed on Arthur B. Metzner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 23:01, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I've declined the speedy deletion - Notability of the academic was asserted. Nice job. Toddst1 (talk) 23:06, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

nessie
oh sorry about that. i assumed the photo had been removed for valid reasons, i should have looked into it properly. xxx Jessi1989 (talk) 16:56, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Roundhay
Please stop removing this image. Your nuisance edits are tantamount to vandalism. Please consider before doing so that placing the photograph on the right hand side, in general text would upset the page layout. If you prefer it in the box of images at the bottom then please move it there, rather then remove it altogeter. Surely if this was the case, then the chuch in the history section should also be relocated to the religion section. Mtaylor848 (talk) 17:43, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * You have placed a picture of Street Lane as the main image of a section marked "History". It has no particular relevance and provides no added value to the section. I appreciate your enthusiasm for North Leeds, but think you are being impolite to call my edits nuisance and vandalism.

The building of St John's Church was an important part of the history of the area, and illustrates the adjacent text. Churches are facts in history, and I support the Wikipedia NPOV.Chemical Engineer (talk) 17:59, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

While I would agree with you that the church is a historical building, surely it has to be linked in for a reason. If you prefer the picture elsewhere there is a gallery at the bottom. Considering Street Lane is Roundhay's main street, and besides the park and mansion, the shops on it are probably its best known buildings, a photograph of them is surely required to enhance the article. Ideally the photograph would be put on the right under the info box, but this would disorientate the layout (as is a problem with many pages). The picture could be moved to the top and placed on the left, alternatively it could be put in the info box and the park picture tied in with the park section. Mtaylor848 (talk) 18:05, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The picture of the church of St John is adjacent to text about its construction and effect on the area, which was considerable. Your picture of Street Lane you have put adjacent to text about the Doomsday book.  Which is more appropriate?Chemical Engineer (talk)

License tagging for File:HowToBeAnAlien.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:HowToBeAnAlien.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Done.Chemical Engineer (talk) 22:27, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

The Long Banana Skin
Hi Chemical Engineer.

As requested, I've had a go at expanding the article but it's mostly from memory as I've recently moved and haven't unpacked my copy yet. Regards, Ian Dunster (talk) 11:07, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Leeds
There is currently a discussion regarding splitting of the Leeds article. As you were involved in the previous merge discussion you might be interested in this. Quantpole (talk) 22:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Foyers
Hi, thank you for your work. On Foyers, a question. Is Aleister Crowley's old hiomestead within the Village limits now? In his time it lay two miles outside of the Village, but I don't know if it has expanded. Thanks, Aleister Wilson (talk) 23:21, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Peter Victor Danckwerts
Thanks for adding this further reading link - any chance you have access to the article and could incorporate the text into our bio? Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 21:43, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

I have not got time at the moment but put it there in case anyone else has access and the time. Otherwise I will get round to it eventually. Chemical Engineer (talk) 21:52, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Malvern College
Hi ! The Old Malvernians/alumnae section  that  you  contributed to in Malvern College finally  got so  long  that  it  had to  be split  off into  a separate list page. In doing  so, it's been found that  for many  of those noble people there is no  actual proof that they  ever went  to the school. However, they probably did, and  the entries were made in  good faith. Nevertheless, the rules require everything in the encyclopedia to  be verifiably  sourced. It would be great therefore, if you could take a look  at  the list  and help out if you  can with  providing  some references. The people all  have their own Wiki  articles, but  it  is no  guarantee that  the mentions of Malvern College (if any) are correctly  cited. Thanks. --Kudpung (talk) 17:01, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Sheffield railway station
Hi, in your edit here you say that EMT are to apply again for planning permission for the ticket barriers, but the reference you quoted does not mention this. Do you have a sufficient reference? Regards, Schumi  555  21:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I have corrected the link. Chemical Engineer (talk) 23:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot. Schumi  555  10:02, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Your edits made on March 17, 2010 (UTC) to List of Mensans
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of Mensans, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. 71.166.152.95 (talk) 17:13, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know who you are, but Jack Cohen is said to be a Mensan in his article, as with others in the list. I see no reason to duplicate the reference.Chemical Engineer (talk) 18:48, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The reason is Verifiability ... just because someone "is said to be a Mensan in their article" is insufficient ... you need to quote a Reliable source for this kind of thing every place that it is mentioned because of Biographies of living persons ... see here and here for some history of this article (my comments from 2007). As for who I am, follow the prominent links on my User and Talk pages to User:The Bipolar Anon-IP Gnome ... now you know more about me than I know about you, as if that means anything here. &mdash; 71.166.152.95 (talk) 20:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. We have a lot in common. Age for one. Chemical Engineer (talk) 17:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Arthur Dehon Little article
Hello. Thanks for tidying up my recent edits to the Arthur Dehon Little article. The Servos article on the history of Chemical Engineering at MIT 1900-1939 was interesting and pertinent to Little, so that's why I added it. A good read. Bests. --- (Bob) Wikiklrsc (talk) 20:41, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 19:24, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

St James's
The misguided editor who moved the article to a "correct" title did the same for a Dublin hospital St James's Hospital. I'd like to WP:AGF, but that requires that we assume a stubborn refusal to recognise that all previous editors to the articles were getting it right! I've stuck a note into the article text of each of them, to try to dissuade similar moves in future. Sorry about the duplicated ref - thanks for tidying it up. PamD (talk) 21:33, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Herbert McLeod
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   12:04, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. Not one of the most surprising DYKs.Chemical Engineer (talk) 20:52, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry for not asking you, but I was amazed that the article is that short and no image of the McLeod gauge. My boss showed me one and he said: This is a McLeod gauge!! And you know we have two of them! Making fun of the "There can be only one," catch phrase of Highlander (film).--Stone (talk) 22:49, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * There was an article about the gauge with a picture, so I thought it worthwhile having one about the inventor. As there is a separate article, I did not think it worth having the picture here as well. What would be nice would be a picture of Herbert.Chemical Engineer (talk) 22:58, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Lord Mayor of Leeds
An article that you have been involved in editing, Lord Mayor of Leeds, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. LNWWatcher (talk) 15:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Alumni notice
Hi, with regard to this deletion, you might be misunderstanding the extent of the alumni template. This is not just a question of notability but also whether these people really are verifiable as alumni. The blue linked articles may or may not be for the right person intended, their associated citations and article titles may change over time and so currently or in the future they might have no references that confirm whether they are an alumnus. See the guidance of WP:NLIST and the essay at User:Fæ/Alumni. Unless there is a clear rationale as to why this article might be an exception I propose the template is re-added with its original date. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 13:45, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Bingham1a.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bingham1a.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 05:31, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

ATSE & FTSE.
Hi! For reasons I don't really understand, I seem to have gone off on a tangent and involved myself with ATSE and FTSE. If you feel you can add some value to these pages, and would enjoy doing so, please "go for it"! I'm about to ramp down my interaction and go back to my "normal" domain. However, should you so wish, and you feel you'd like assistance, please don't hesitate to solicit my help. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 13:45, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help - it is appreciated. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 06:53, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

King Edward's School, Birmingham
Thank you for ‘reducing’ my opinion statements.

1. Would you consider re-inserting the word ‘rare’. Two of the surnames in question were ‘Sacret’ and ‘Honeybone’. I suggest that both these names are unquestionably rare; and that their selection by Rudkin must have been deliberate, thereby justifying the use of the word ‘rare’. What do you think?

2. "Coe (OE c1972-1979) has said that he has set out to geographically identify Birmingham as a specific place, something which he claims is never done in English literature for places other than London". This comes from a published interview with Coe some time ago; regrettably I can no long locate it. Flying Stag (talk) 19:22, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Lesley Yellowlees DYK
Hi CE, I just reviewed your DYK nomination. There are some issues that need to be addressed before it could be passed. Thank you, --Al Ameer son (talk) 23:48, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Lesley Yellowlees
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Bury GS
Thanks for your contributions to and co-operation with the BGS articles - especially images. I was hoping to get down there this coming weekend to take some photographs when there is nobody around but, of course, am not sure if I will make it or the weather will be helpful and photogenic. As mentioned on my user page, I'm not well-placed for referencing at present but hope to be able to access my books again soon; in the meantime, do please continue to chip in anything that is better than I can find online. Having "been bold" and separated these articles, I'm keen they should both work! Misha An interested observer of this and that 23:33, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

I don't see what the problem was either; the new photographs are certainly an improvement. Thanks for your trouble.Misha An interested observer of this and that 14:12, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Images
Hi Chemical Engineer, Apologies for reverting you a few days ago - Not sure why there was no edit summary but basically I hadn't realised you were the photographer of the 2 you were replacing and unfortunately many photographers here tend to replace images with theirs and their images usully aren't an an improvement over the previous ones but anyway had I known you were the photographer I wouldn't of reverted but anyway just wanted to apologise for that,

Happy editing :), – Davey 2010 Talk 22:06, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Apologies accepted. I agree with your general observation on replacing images.Chemical Engineer (talk)

DYK nomination of Tuzex
Hello! Your submission of Tuzex at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:05, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 21:04, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Merger Proposal
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Public Space Protection Order&mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WPCW (talk • contribs) 12:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Tuzex
Hello! Your submission of Tuzex at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:31, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Talkback
North America1000 08:04, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Tuzex
– Ianblair23 (talk) 01:18, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hull and East Riding Museum
Hello! Your submission of Hull and East Riding Museum at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:14, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 21:03, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 21:29, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Hull and East Riding Museum
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for your kindness in adding the Genuine Yorkshire Rose label to my talk page - BobKilcoyne (talk) 04:54, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * It was very well deserved. Chemical Engineer (talk) 11:01, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Xmas

 * 2018 XMAS.pdf FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:17, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Images of England
The Images of England web site is to be decommissioned this month by Historic England. The text of the site entries has been available on the corresponding National Heritage List entry since that web site was created. The images are being transferred ahead of the decommissioning. As a result of this a BOT has changed all IoE templates to NHLE templates and translated the reference number according to a list provided by Historic England.

It would be good if members could check these, when they come across them, as I have spotted one with an incorrect translation. Some articles already had NHLE templates in them so the references may need to be combined. Other changes that may need to be performed are removal of template or text referring to the site as needing registration, changing the text "Images of England" or "IoE" to something more appropriate or may be even removing it if it is part of the description..


 * WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project

The August 2019 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.

Please nominate future articles for improvement at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire.


 * Please bear in mind...

The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.

Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible. Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
 * Monitoring is essential
 * Moves

Delivered August 2019 by MediaWiki message delivery.
 * }
 * }

If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

01:43, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Season's Greetings
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:07, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - May 2021
Delivered May 2021 by MediaWiki message delivery.

If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

11:50, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - June 2021
Delivered June 2021 by MediaWiki message delivery.

If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

16:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of World Class Schools Quality Mark for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Class Schools Quality Mark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/World Class Schools Quality Mark until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Girth Summit  (blether) 18:51, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi - I don't want to come across as an aggressive or heavy-handed deletionist here (and since I see you are a fellow Wikiproject Yorkshire member, I don't want you to come over to York and biff me on the nose), but there's no easy way to say this: the creation of that article wasn't OK. You're autopatrolled, which means that the community trusts you to create articles that don't need to be reviewed by New Page Patrol. The article mentioned above has no supporting independent, secondary sources, just an entry on an exhaustive database of registered UK charities, and the charity's own website. That's not on for someone with your advanced permissions: please be more careful. Anything you create needs to be have enough independent, secondary and reliable sources to demonstrate notability. Cheers Girth Summit  (blether)  18:58, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi. No offence taken.  I made a start but was a bit disappointed I could not find more.  I am no kind of expert on Wikipedia's rules, just someone who tries to help out. Chemical Engineer (talk) 22:57, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Institution of Chemical Engineers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Steel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!
Happy Holidays text.png Chemical_Engineer Enjoy the holiday season&#32;and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, RV (talk) 07:27, 24 December 2022 (UTC) Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Disambiguation link notification for May 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vulcanization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vulcan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Parkinson&#39;s Law Book.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Parkinson&, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 10:24, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

File:KletzBiography.gif listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KletzBiography.gif, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 10:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Seacroft Scroll thumb.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Seacroft Scroll thumb.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 09:25, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Leeds Wikipedia meetup on Saturday 4th May
Hello there! Interested in having a chat with fellow Wikipedians? There's a meetup in Leeds on Saturday 4th May 2024, at the Tiled Hall Café at Leeds Central Library.

Full details here.

You're receiving this one-off message as you're either a member of WikiProject Yorkshire, you've expressed an interest in a previous Leeds meetup years ago, or (for about 4 of you), we've met :)

I plan to organise more in future, so if you'd like to be notified next time, please say so over on the meetup page.

Please also invite any Wikimedia people you know (or have had wiki dealings with) – spread the word! Hope to see you there.

Jonathan Deamer (talk)

20:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)