User talk:Chemicalinterest/Archive 2

Chromite
Just want to say thanks for clearing up the confusion between chromite (mineral) and chromite (the ion/salt). Keep up the good work!&mdash;Tetracube (talk) 17:45, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * How did you see it so fast? --Chemicalinterest (talk) 17:45, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I've moved the mineral article back as most links are to the mineral. The hatnote added by Tetracube should take care of other chemical searchers. As to the so fast bit, was likely on his watchlist as on mine. Please discuss page moves on article talk first. Thanks, Vsmith (talk) 20:11, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Glass B - SiO2
You know cooking process glass and glass shaped glass no? The quality of glass phase on the following components: 15% B2O3, 80% SiO2, Al2O3 2% to 3% but left me not knowing to what the, you know? ---> My goal is just want the type of heat resistant glass has good corrosion by acid and alkali! Data component so good? --אנונימי גבר (talk) 02:33, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * All alkalis corrode glass slowly, concentrated aqueous sodium hydroxide (Rare caesium hydroxide is very corrosive). Polyethylene would be better in some ways. No acids attack glass. Glass normally contains flux such as sodium carbonate to help it melt at a cooler temperature. My recipe says: 80% SiO2, 5% Na2O (as Na2CO3), 15% B2O3, 2% Al2O3, and some other CaO and K2O (as K2CO3). --Chemicalinterest (talk) 11:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm only 16 and high school chemistry student interested in chemistry though. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 11:02, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Feedback reorganization


Hello! You recently posted a Request for Feedback here. We are currently "remodeling" the Requests for Feedback system and all entries have been archived. They can be found here. Any responses or posts there, however will not be seen. If you need additional feedback or have any questions, feel free to post at my talk page, or, when it is done, the new Feedback page. Also, we encourage you to help provide feedback! - No matter how new you may be, anyone can read an article and provide constructive comments!

If you have any questions or need help, feel free to leave me a message at my talk page. You can also talk to us live, with this or this. Happy editing!  Chzz  ► 07:26, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Transuranic Elements
Yeah I was not logged into by wiki account when i did the massive edit for unbihexium. Anyway you can see that I clearly see interest in elements beyond Uranium, particularly the island of stabilities at Thorium, Uranium, Ununquadium, and Unbihexium. Thanks for the commentary! 96.255.78.201 (talk) 00:22, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * My knowledge of radioactive elements is not large, so I cannot help out in that area. What is your wiki account? If it keeps logging you out then you can select "Remember me (for 30 days)" when logging in. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 00:24, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

disambiguating titles of new pages
RE: Ten Mile Run (New Jersey) and Simonson Brook (New Jersey). Is there a reason the pages could not be named Ten Mile Run and Simonson Brook? I understand that multiple streams with those names may exist, but unless there is another Wikipedia page with those titles it is not necessary to disambiguate. Or perhaps you are planning to create pages for other rivers with those names? Gjs238 (talk) 13:48, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No I just did that for uniformity with the article for the Six Mile Run, my starting point in geography work. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 13:50, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Not necessary unless disambiguation is required. I see you've also done this with Ireland Brook (New Jersey), Cross Brook (New Jersey), Steep Hill Brook (New Jersey), Beaverdam Brook (New Jersey), Cow Yard Brook (New Jersey).  Not trying to be hostile, but all the disambiguation isn't necessary.  Gjs238 (talk) 13:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * See all articles I created at User:Chemicalinterest/Articles I created. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 13:55, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, they're excellent! Thanks  Gjs238 (talk) 14:07, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * If you look at List of rivers of New Jersey, you can see that the Raritan River section had very low coverage, which is why I decided to improve it. I live at 40.45056°N, -74.53583°W so I have easy access to the streams and can get easy access to the streams. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 14:11, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Sometimes I assume everyone lives in my area and catch myself writing "It crosses the canal" instead of "It crosses the Delaware and Raritan Canal". I see how you help with diffs like these. Thanks for your help. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 14:16, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Cr-V
An alloy is composed of vanadium (V) and Chromium (Cr), how the two can be separated from the metal alloy of it? This alloy is particularly weak magnetic and suction are Iron and Iron powder. I know the nature of the two metals are very similar, separating it from the alloy is probably a bit difficult!--אנונימי גבר (talk) 07:31, 22 June 2010 (UTC)>I give a solution of Sodium Hypochloride and Sodium hydroxyde, and the effect of Chromium alloy - Vanadium is obtained a brown black precipitate, which I think may be Chromium (III, II) oxide. But what is it with you?--אנונימי גבר (talk) 10:23, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

I personally think this reaction is due to the Sodium Hypochloride liberated oxygen atoms that make up the alloy oxidized


 * The brown is oxidized vanadium as hydrated vanadium pentoxide. The hypochlorite oxidizes the vanadium with the help of the hydroxide. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 10:54, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Oh, maybe I was wrong!, solid dark brown that I can mention is sodium Dichromat, because I have used many of the alloy surface with chrome effect on the solution and obtained the same solid dark brown.--אנונימי גבר (talk) 09:19, 28 June 2010 (UTC)


 * A chromium compound? Let me think... I have done some reactions involving oxidation of chrome alloys... What about vanadium chromate? Sodium dichromate is orange, similar to unhydrated vanadium pentoxide. Many transition metal chromates are insoluble, nickel chromate, iron chromate. What would happen is the sodium hypochlorite would oxidize both the vanadium and the chromium to vanadium(V) and chromium(III). Air would oxidize the chromium(III) to chromium(VI) in alkaline conditions. It would combine with the vanadium(V) to form the vanadium chromate. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 10:48, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Hypothesis can say is you are right, thank you very much! I also tell you is that I use metal components include a Chrome and Platinum. Platinum can not be oxidized by NaOCl, so I think only new chrome reaction with NaOCl and NaOH alone! and I also added that after the precipitation reaction is a powder, amorphous, orange (after filtering solutions, I found it a pale orange rather than brown black) and it is less soluble in water and perhaps it has low toxicity (because I had been a splash of this substance in the mouth and eyes but where symptoms have found!) I've decided for this substance reacts with hydrochloric acid, see the colored products obtained What conclusions, then it is like alloy product of Chrome - Vanadium to react with NaOCl and NaOH does not?.--אנונימי גבר (talk) 03:11, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Do you have any pictures of Chromium (III) Oxide and Chrome (IV) oxide, no?--אנונימי גבר (talk) 04:13, 29 June 2010 (UTC)


 * To answer your second question; chromium(IV) oxide is manmade, while chromium(III) oxide has a picture on the article. Cr2O3 is very dark green, converting to brown when heated; CrO2 is black, as far as I know. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 10:46, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * First question: What concentration bleach are you using? Household bleach (6%) or more concentrated? If it is concentrated, I would not doubt that it is chromium trioxide or its related compound chromic acid I don't think it is low toxicity. Hexavalent chromium in its acid form is carcinogenic and gives you chrome ulcers. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 10:46, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * A proof would be to react the precipitate with hydrochloric acid. If it fizzes forming chlorine gas and a green solution, then it is chromium trioxide. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 11:21, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

I think the black-brown precipitate was filtered by an electric stove is an oxidizing medium because when it reacts with oxygen H2O2, it is only relatively weak compared to MnO2--אנונימי גבר (talk) 13:13, 29 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't know how you got the black-brown precipitate. I saw how you got the pale orange though. Could you please explain? --Chemicalinterest (talk) 13:15, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The decomposition of hydrogen peroxide is by catalysis by MnO2, not reduction. You could keep using and using the MnO2 and it never finishes. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 13:17, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Chemistry
I absolutely love chemistry. However, I am currently sufferring from an acute dearth of chemistry know-how. I need to master it. --478jjjz (talk) 12:20, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Is Valence bond theory, VSEPR, & molecular orbital theory part of inorganic chemistry?--478jjjz (talk) 13:53, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * It is more like theoretical chemistry, but I can try to answer your question. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 13:56, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't have any particular question right now. However, I will ask when I come across a question that baffles me.  Apropos, I have found http://web.me.com/chemguy1/Chemguy.com/DVD_Contents_.html extremely helpful.--478jjjz (talk) 14:00, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Just a notice: User:478jjjz is the page where you put information about yourself; see User:Chemicalinterest for an example. User talk:478jjjz is where people post messages for you; this page is an example. Thank you. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 14:13, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Chemistry Website
Do you know any website can offer me a full modulation (separation) of metals from ores are not, but I need to write documents in words! sorry for the inconvenience you!--אנונימי גבר (talk) 03:10, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No inconvenience. The first thing I can think of is this site, Wikipedia. Go to Portal:Chemistry. There is a periodic table at the bottom of the page. Click the element that you are interested in and go to the "Production" or the "Preparation" or the "Isolation" or the "Manufacturing" section to see how it is formed. I'll see if I can find more later. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 10:42, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Help
Please help.--478jjjz (talk) 16:41, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll respond on the query in the ref desk. Thank you. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 18:02, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Reply
Well, I do have a new question to consult you, still in #Why does an acidic oxide reacts with water to form an acid? section in Reference desk/Science. I am profoundly grateful. 114.247.10.133 (talk) 12:55, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Canal (Big Ditch)
There is one WP:FA on a canal - see Manchester Bolton & Bury Canal. I think this may be a useful model. I know has written some articles on canals too, see the listing at User:Finetooth. These are mostly historical canal articles, so if it is a short canal and still in existence, and the planned article is short, I think a river article would be a decent model. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 18:55, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Image licenses
You just need to add the appropriate license tag to the images, (just by editing the text of the page). LMK if you need further help :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:38, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Silver phosphate
Hi, you might be interested in taking a look at Template_talk:Did_you_know. Cheers Smartse (talk) 14:26, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I never nominated anything for DYK, featured article, or any of that so I will let you take care of it. Thanks. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 14:28, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

The "Getting saved" section of your userpage
May I suggest that you make a few changes to this part of your userpage? Linking to "New Testament", linking and spelling out "KJV", and a few other changes would likely make this section more comprehensible to someone not familiar with the Bible. Nyttend (talk) 22:23, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm just wanting to know if there's anything I need to be saved from that doesn't also require religious belief? HiLo48 (talk) 02:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Being saved is your choice. God gave you a choice to believe in him or not, which is why the Inquisition is wrong. If you believe in God, then you accept his view of you as a sinner and then learn that you need to get saved. If you do not believe in God, then you do not accept his view of you as a sinner and so you don't need salvation. An analogy would be: You have been diagnosed with a supposedly terminal cancer. It does not cause you much pain normally, but life just seems to be useless with the impending death. Along comes a doctor with a cure for you. You can accept it or continue living your way. But there is a price to pay for being saved. The God-unbelieving crowd will ridicule you because it is weird to put yourself under a set of rules. Another analogy is that you have to cross a deep ravine. Instead of building a bridge (tooooo much work), you put a blindfold on your eyes; now the ravine is gone! So easy! All because you do not see the danger does not mean it doesn't exist. To get saved you have to "cross" hell. You can put a blindfold on and say, I don't see hell. Or you can submit yourself to God and his way and cross on his bridge. The main problem people have is that they need to submit; I am too sinful to save myself. I am utterly useless to go to heaven. I am like an ant trying to jump a meter high. I can't do it. Only God can do it. If this wasn't what you asked, please let me know. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 11:01, 24 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I faded away from religion because of irrational, mystical stuff like this. My life doesn't feel useless in the slightest. HiLo48 (talk) 22:47, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thats only because you can't see how your life is. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 23:08, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Cruser Brook
Greetings. If you want to create a new page a piece at a time, you might consider making a draft. Some folks might try to speedy such initial drafts in the article space. Regards, P. D. Cook  Talk to me! 17:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I just started making it then went to explore a stream so left it unfinished. Thanks for the reference too. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 19:06, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

New articles
Are you sure you have the right person? I don't remember saying that but I could have three years ago when I was new. Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 20:48, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Well, I sure did say it. Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 20:54, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

I'll fix it then. Thanks. Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 21:00, 23 July 2010 (UTC)