User talk:Chemistryclaus

Nonsense of Inorganic expositionary fermentation
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Inorganic expositionary fermentation, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Inorganic expositionary fermentation provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Inorganic expositionary fermentation, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Chemistry claus"
A page you created, Chemistry claus, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Top Gear  Freak  20:17, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Please stop
...adding unencyclopedic material. If you continue to do so, your editing privileges may be revoked.  AK Radecki Speaketh  20:18, 20 December 2008 (UTC)