User talk:Chernyat

October 2014
Hello, I'm Frosty. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Lucy Liu— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Frosty ☃ 10:22, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lucy Liu with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —Frosty ☃ 10:48, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Lewis Ender. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of the templates has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BC talk to me  16:51, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Please do not remove maintenance or other templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lewis Ender, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. ''Please provide proper reliable sources (even just one) that will confirm the veracity of this article. Your current references do not provide enough information for verification and seem unrelated to the article. See Citing sources. You can place the verifiable source or sources in the references section or mention them in the talk page or in the edit summary.'' BC  talk to me  16:22, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Lewis Ender for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lewis Ender is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lewis Ender until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jinkinson  talk to me  14:02, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lewis Ender


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Lewis Ender, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tchaliburton (talk) 02:32, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:18, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Lewis Ender in 1950.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lewis Ender in 1950.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. BC talk to me  18:07, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Lewis Ender in 1863.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lewis Ender in 1863.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. BC talk to me  18:09, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Its More Than What You Think!
Over the past two months, many of you might have seen my account as the center of various vandal acts, but I'm here to inform you all that I have finally taken access of my account as it has been hacked resulting in the real user (which is me) having no control of the account. It wasn't until last week that I finally gain control of the account with the only trace of the anonymous hacker being the vandalism acts you guys are aware of and I would like to apologize for those who have felt offended by what was written.

Now that I have control I aim to turn the account from a negative to a positive symbol, by editing accurate information on articles and not making up any articles that are of fiction like the most notable being Lewis Ender. I'm aware why my account is blocked from editing articles, but I don't understand why there is no expiry date. If I want to expose this account's positivity I do hope to obtain a expiry date no matter how long it takes.

Many of you would still doubt me, but I hope by the time I'm unblocked and begin to change my account's path your thought on me could change.