User talk:Cherylktardif

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! RJFJR 05:00, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Line


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Follow up
Hi. It was very nice to arrive and be greeted by a smile. Instant karma! I take your point that the post you refer to is personal and unwelcome. As you pointed out, it's "newbie" territory, and I'm trying to extend the easiest way forward for everyone. If your copybook was clean, you would have a stronger case, but it's probably best not to open Pandora's Box (if you'll excuse the sequential incongruity of images there). As I pointed out VANITY edits do tend to get under some people's skin, and then they get extended some tolerance for that situation. Furthermore, altering someone else's talk is considered vandalism. You didn't know that of course, which I accept, and that's why I don't feel the need to act on it.

Correspondingly, I assume that Lgh was also not aware of the primacy that is placed on NPA. There has been an apology for tone, not content. In other words, a criticism was meant, but the manner of it was wrong. We do allow criticism and it's safe if this is directed to the edit, and not the editor, to the idea and not the embodier of that idea. And, yes, CIVIL is expected. As I said, in the normal course of events, talk should not be altered, although there is latitude for deleting personal attacks, so you could go ahead and do it, if you felt confident of putting your case if challenged. One way is to put a place holder, as in [personal attack removed] for the offending portion(s).

However, this may achieve the opposite to what you intend. When I read the post, I didn't experience a lowering of your estimation in my eyes. It was the poster upon whom it reflected badly, and this is how it would be generally read. In addition, it may be more viable to leave it there as "evidence" for any recurrence. Of course, it will still be in the history, but a third party, perhaps an investigating admin, is not likely to find it there. By leaving it, it also enables the whole thread to be followed properly.

Victoriagirl has not edited since I put my generic message on her page, and I think she will probably archive, as you have. The message will therefore be hidden anyway from gaze. I would recommend leaving it like that. There's nothing to pursue in terms of blocks etc, because that wouldn't be given. The other user has apologised. A warning has been given. Usually there are up to 4 warnings before a block, although it can be less. We like to give people a chance to get it right. You may, as another alternative, ask Lgh to strike the portions she wishes to withdraw, but putting in front and after, which will draw a line (try it!). This has the advantage of showing its withdrawal, while preserving the record.

In any event, it would not be acceptable to reword the comment, as it would then distort the record of events, which may be necessary to examine in the future.

Yes, sometimes people are impatient with new users, probably because they do not realise you are a new user, or they have mistaken an error for vandalism. It is easy enough to explain that the action was genuine, but that you are still a new user.

Tyrenius 05:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I hope everyone involved in the fracas will be able to move on with a better understanding of how to work in wiki. There's a bit of a learning curve, but we AGF unless the contrary is proved. Yes, there's some great behaviour on wiki! Maybe useful material for a book... However, there are many more fine, intelligent and helpful individuals, so it's just a matter of building up contacts. Wiki is a remarkable social and cultural phenomenon, which has already made history. It is amazing how widely it is now used, so it's important to maintain the highest standard for articles. Copy-editing, for one thing, is always valuable input from skilled writers.


 * As you are currently editing under your own name, you might consider opening an account with a pseudonym. This could be instead of your main account, or in addition to. However, if it is the latter, then it's important to maintain a rigid demarcation between the two, and they should never participate in the same article, voting process and so on. It would be useful if you wanted to contribute to subjects where you might not want your public persona to be identified, for example. However, you are welcome to carry on editing exactly as present, if you prefer. You can have fun exploring barnstars at Barnstars and linked pages! If you need any further help or advice, let me know. Tyrenius 20:50, 28 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you for prettifying my page and for the cool archive graphic at the top! All the best!:) (Cherylktardif 02:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC))

Image:Cherylsmallgood new.jpg
Hello, Cherylktardif. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Cherylsmallgood new.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Cherylktardif/Bio. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or    media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 20:31, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Whale-cover-lg.jpg
Hello Cherylktardif, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Whale-cover-lg.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Cherylktardif/Whale. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Survey
Hi Cheryl!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 03:58, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Whale Song (novel) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Whale Song (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Whale Song (novel)& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 18:08, 7 January 2018 (UTC)