User talk:Chestmas

May 2015

 * You don't seem like a new editor to me. Chillum 18:26, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Chillum 1) All the previous editors you claim are the same as me, fumbled all the way through. They also made no edits I made. I just read them all; there is no possible way we are the same person, beyond my saying so (which I would know). This is just insulting. 2) Not every new editor is stupid, how is it not easy to follow the examples of the people you are discussing with. Saying "oh, you know how to talk to me, so you must be bad" is a serious breach of what IG called good faith. 3) You have zero evidence that I have disrupted Wikipedia in any way. You cannot show in any way that I have done anything but tried to discuss Wikipedia, got shut down by an aggressive editor, and complained. I read the policy now, a sock block requires you to disrupt the site. How have I done that? 4) No one has responded to my requests to discuss promotional writing on the Vocativ page. No one. And then I get blocked. I have to agree, it is very suspicious that there is some COI (conflicting interest) going on here, as I read on the talk page before contributing. Chestmas (talk) 18:31, 2 May 2015 (UTC)


 * We do not have to agree on this. Another uninvolved admin will give you another review soon. I will respect the judgment of that admin. Chillum 18:33, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Chillum Thank you. If I get block for this, I'm fine with that, as there are likely many rules I do not know. To be honest, I have very little further interest in the Vocativ page at this point. Just thought I'd poke my nose in to help. Vocativ is a pretty big outfit in the US, and a lot of us read it. I read it all the time. A lot of hackers do. Though apparently none of us are smart enough to deal with this site :) True what they say about the inclusionary environment here. Reminds me of the early 90s. Good luck to you. Chestmas (talk) 18:40, 2 May 2015 (UTC)