User talk:Chesuq

TB not a subject of interest in case?
re: (Undid revision 439015230 by Chesuq (talk)No, no. Sorry. TB not a subject of interest in case. See Talk page. Also not NPOV DSK has filed agianst for slander.) (undo) ..

Not a subject of interest? although Strauss-Kahn uncorroborated opinion that Nicolas Sarkozy is trying to frame Strauss-Kahn is allowed, as is opinions uttered by persons with no direct knowlege of the case such as by Michèle Sabban, Henri de Raincourt, Vladimir Putin, Brigitte Guillemette, and Carmen Llera. But there must be no reference on Wikipedia to writer Tristane Banon in regards to another allegation of sexual assault that is currently proceeding through the French Courts. Sorry, but no one is allowed to say anything negative about Strauss-Kahn, regardless of the source. Feel free to totally trash the alleged victims reputation, she is a nobody after all ...

`The New York Times quoted a law enforcement official as saying that a translation of the call revealed she had used words to the effect of "Don’t worry, this guy has a lot of money. I know what I’m doing."'

This is also deemed suitable although a direct quote from the chief assistant DA saying the exact opposite - that Strauss-Kahn's accuser did not target him for financial gain - is not deemed suitable as it's 'tabloid junk`, whatever that means. If I didn't know any better I might suspect some major spin and manipulation going on here.

emacsuser (talk) 16:59, 12 July 2011 (UTC)