User talk:Cheyannide/sandbox

article analysis
article evaluation

article 1: tertiary sources

for this page although, it seemed pretty explained for what the topic was, I felt like some parts needed more explaining. for example, I did not quite understand what the difference between a tertiary and secondary source was and how they are connected but different? also I felt that the types of tertiary sources was a bit confusing to understand and needed more explanation. I did like how the article remained mainly neutral and unbiased. for the source notes, the first one I clicked on was unavailable (idk if that was a error on my part but I don't think it was) so either it was not accessible to the public or maybe it was removed? I did click on another source that worked so I'm glad one was available.

article 2: jimmy wales

this article in whole is very thorough with its entire explanation and overview of this man. It maintains a pretty neutral stance and when things were mentioned pertaining to "two sides" the writer only stated what was quoted and didn't make assumptions or give opinions. all the sources were relevant and accessible. despite this being a well fleshed out page, I feel that there is a lot of extra info that's not completely needed. it sprinkles in unnecessary embellishments like how many students were in his school and stuff like that. also they added a copy of his signature which I found both odd and extra. I think this page could do with a bit of down sizing.

topic: copic markers
on the copic wiki page, there is no mention on how to decode copic markers which I think is very important to cover for anyone who uses the markers. Since the page makes no reference to the copic coding system, I would personally like to add a section regarding the coding system, decoding what the codes mean and how it is put into use when choosing copics to buy and use. there is also a lack of history on how and why copic markers were made which I would also like to mention. Also, this may be extra but I would personally like to compile a list regarding all the available colors and what types they come in, along with if they have refills.

http://copic.jp/en/about/history/ -talks about the origins and history of the copic marker. I feel there should be some mention as to why the markers were made instaed of just saying "they're cool"

https://imaginationinternationalinc.com/copic/101/copic-color-theory/ -this describes how to decode copic markers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmMhEreUF1g — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheyannide (talk • contribs) 03:59, 18 April 2017 (UTC) - this is my favorite source since I think the video format is super informative and helpful. this video yet again talks about the copic coding system and how to decode it.

http://nattosoup.blogspot.com/2013/02/alcohol-based-markers-vs-water-based.html -I know this is a blogpost but it is very informative about the differences between water based markers and alcohol based markers (which I can include refereeing to the history/ origins of the copic marker).

topic: neo-figurative art
this entire page is just a sentence that includes a few artists that were influences of this movement. there definitely needs to be more explanation as to why is occurred, how it occurred etc. overall there need to be a more in depth look into the origins of the movement.

http://www.theartstory.org/movement-neo-expressionism.htm

https://www.virtualgallery.com/artworks/painting/figurative/neofigurative — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheyannide (talk • contribs) 04:44, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

topic: Christina's world
although this page is good, I feel like it could use some more info maybe about Christina olsen, the olsen family, and possibly a analysis of the painting for its meaning and techniques used to create it.

www.jstor.org/stable/1506917

www.jstor.org/stable/41551665

www.jstor.org/stable/2710909 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheyannide (talk • contribs) 04:50, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

topic: Bee and Puppycat
why are there no synopsis' for the latest eps, they came out in December? id personally like to write up the synopsis' to all 6 new eps as well as add info that needs to be added to the character and background section regarding new info regarding the new eps.


 * all sources would come from the actual series on VRV* — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheyannide (talk • contribs) 15:24, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Coding System
At first glance, there is a noticeable quality about copic markers that differ from some other markers. On the two ends of the marker, the caps have a code that contains a letter(s) and either 2-4 numbers following it. This system of numbers/letters describes the type of marker being used.

First off is the letter(s)in the code. Whatever color group the marker belongs to is symbolized through the first letter(s) in the code. There can be up to 2 letters that show what color family the marker fits into. The colors are abbreviated as follows, for the primary colors there is R which stands for colors in the red family, B for colors in the blue family, and Y for colors in the yellow family. As for the secondary colors, G stands for green, V for purples/violets, and YR for orange. As far as the tertiary colors are concerned, BG stands for blue-green, YG for yellow-green, BV for blue-purple/blue-violet, and RV for pink/red-violet. There are also letters such as E which stand for earth tones/ browns, and letters that reference grays which are N for neutral grays, C for cool grays, W for warm grays and T for toner gray. There are even numbers such as F which signify fluorescent/neon type colors.Lastly there are completely black markers but those are just represented by numbers such as 100 for black and 110 for special black. If still confused about the color that a marker belongs in, for further insurance, the marker caps are also color coded accordingly. It should be noted that only the original, sketch, and wide versions have the codes on the caps and base of the marker; the ciao markers only have colored caps with the code on the base of the marker.

Following the letter is the first number. The pigmentation and saturation directly relate to the first number given to a copic marker. This first number can range from 0-9 and fluctuates depending on the vibrancy of the color given to a marker. The lower the number, around 0-2, the brighter and more intense the color is in pigmentation. Those with a higher number ranging from 3-9 for the first number tend to be more dull and less saturated than those with a lower number.

After the first number, there is one last number. The final number in a copic code signifies what shade the color is. Shade relates to the lightness or darkness of the marker color. Like the saturation, the numbers range from 0-9. Lighter colors tend to be relative to lower numbers such as 0-4 and the darker colors relate to the higher numbers like 5-9. If you can picture a value scale from white to black, that is somewhat like the numbering system, the 0 is the "white" the 9 is the "black" and all the numbers in-between are the ascending/ descending gray values.

There are also a few cases in which a copic code will have more than 2 numbers. These colors will look something like B000, or B0000. These cases only show up in colors that have their saturation and shade numbers marked as zero. The colors just mean that they are even lighter than the "lightest color". For example, take B00, there are even lighter shades of that color even though both its saturation and shade numbers are as low as they can be.

The last code that should be mentioned is the colorless blender. This marker is only coded with a single 0 since it only contains the base of the marker minus the color pigment and is thus colorless. Cheyannide (talk) 03:38, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Cheyannide

Peer Review by Amanda Tyrcha
I believe you have solid information on the topic. Obviously, you'll need to capitalize the first letter of the first word in each sentence, but I know you know that already. I think it's structured well and you're on the right track. I didn't find any spelling or grammar errors, but make sure you read through it to make sure it flows nicely. You're doing a good job so far. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amandatyrcha (talk • contribs) 15:15, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review
Overall, you seem to have a lot of information. It appears you have a few sources that you are referring to for that information, so you should include your citations to avoid plagiarism. Remember to capitalize the first letter of each sentence and names. I still feel like there is further research to be done. Who invented this copic coding? How is it used? How has it changed the artistic world? These are just suggestions. Marygotsch (talk) 15:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Marygotsch