User talk:Chezikah

June 2009
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Elbert Eugene Spriggs worked, and it has been automatically reverted. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here. Thank you. SoxBot III (talk | owner) 14:38, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

responsible editing
Hello,

I have history with the TT myself - I never joined, but came close, and I see the Basin Farm folks around my neck of the woods almost every day, although we're no longer on speaking terms. I just wanted to let you know that, despite the anger and bitterness that you must surely feel for this deceptive group of controllers and ideologues, Wikipedia is not the best place to fight this war. I agree that more balance needs to be brought to the article, but please give some thought to your editing and make wise choices... you must surely know how quickly the internet savvy members, epecially the ones at the Parchment Press offices, could get your IP address banned from Wikipedia for edit warring. I share a lot of your hurt and bitterness, but please, try to transform it peacefully, and use this site to share wisdom, not venom. Don't be like them. Peace -- jaybird 71.169.155.237 (talk) 23:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello again,

Wikipedia is really not the place to express the difficult emotional scars that this group leaves on ex-members. You will almost certainly see your account locked or banned if this vandalism continues. Try to repay evil with love and kindness, and your healing will become easier. Peace -- Jaybird vt (talk) 18:25, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Yellow Deli
Hello, Thanks for working on this article. All of your external links had bad punctuation: you use double brackets  for internal articles but single ones [] for external links. Even with that change, 3 of your 5 additions were invalid and one talked about 12 tribes with no reference to the Deli. I fixed the one link that worked and was about the article. If you need any assistance with links, just let me know.RevelationDirect (talk) 02:01, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Please reach out to me rather than just reposting non-productive posts. I fixed and left your Rick Ross link that discussed how the Yellow Deli was a cult because it was sourced and actually mentioned the deli.  I have no axe to grind here.  If you have sources that the Yellow Deli gets bad restaurant reviews, fails it health inspections or exploits members of the church, let's add that to the article.RevelationDirect (talk) 17:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Chezikah, here are the specific issues:
 * www.iottc.blogspot.com This is not formatted correctly, which is why it's a red link. Even if you go to the article, it talks about the 12 tribes but is not about the Deli.  Others will critique that the source is a blog.
 * www.yattt.blogspot.com This is not formatted correctly, which is why it's a red link. Even if you go to the article, it talks about the 12 tribes but is not about the Deli.  Others will critique that the source is a blog.
 * twelve tribes_ex.org Not only is this link not formatted correctly for Wikipedia, it's not even a valid website page.
 * [] This is not formatted correctly, which is why it shows as a citation.  Even if you go to the article, it talks about the 12 tribes but is not about the Deli.
 * www.twelvetribesteachings.com This is not formatted correctly, which is why it's a red link. Even if you go to the article, it talks about the 12 tribes but is not about the Deli. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:04, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Request for editor assistance
Hello, I have requested editor assistance at this link: Editor assistance/Requests. I hope this helps bring us together on how best to improve the 12 Tribe articles going forward.RevelationDirect (talk) 03:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Elbert Eugene Spriggs
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Running On Brains (talk page) 02:20, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * You do not appear able to edit articles on this topic in a neutral way. Please find another topic, one that you're less biased about, to edit. If you continue to make inappropriate edits your privileges may be suspended.   Will Beback    talk    08:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.  Will Beback   talk    10:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * You've ignored repeated warnings to desist from adding unsourced, POV material to artices and especially a BLP. Your editing privileges are temporarily suspended. Please read three key Wikipedia policies, WP:V, WP:NPOV, and WP:BLP, before editing again.    Will Beback    talk    10:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Jaybird vt (talk) 01:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.