User talk:Chiefmanzzz

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

File permission problem with File:KFm-Family-descriptions3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KFm-Family-descriptions3.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 01:26, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

File Copyright problem: Kline–Fogleman airfoil

 * uploading File:KFm-Family-descriptions3.jpg.

Dear Ww2censor i have been through this many times already and the file has been approved by the Wikipedia group many years ago. I have permission from the inventor of the foil who is also the creator of the file KFm-Family-descriptions3.jpg

I have WRITTEN permission from Dick Kline and WRITTEN approval from Wikipedia. I am disappointed we need to consistently need to revisit this issue which is considered resolved by wikipedia. Please research your inbox and mail to find history of correspondence between Dick Kline, Wikipedia and myseld which resolves this issue. I expect this matter to be put to rest once again.

Reply
Hello All information on the Kline Fogleman airfoil is original work that other web sites have used from Dick Kline who is the inventor of the airfoil. He wrote the information and gave it to me to put on Wikipedia. Please help me understand how I need to have his original work left on this site. other sites who may have "borrowed this information do not own the information. If the site RC foamfighters gives me permission to use this information ( Which they have in an email )will this suffice ? Alternatively i can get Dick Kline to rewrite what he originally wrote. Your reply does not explain how the author of the work (Dick Kline) cannot use his own work on Wikipedia just because another site used it on theirs as a Quote No Copyright was obtained for this work.


 * Please read the links above about copyright, and WP:OTRS will be able to help in identifying copyright permissions. Canterbury Tail   talk  13:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Palio dates
There is no need to restore the dates, as I did not remove them. One who wishes to know the the nonna can look for the earliest date. Adding the number of years and days would crowd the page to no purpose. —Tamfang (talk) 15:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Palio di Siena
Hello, are you trying to nominate Palio di Siena as a Good Article?-- Beloved Freak  08:46, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Yes the Italian Wikipedia article is a Featured article and I am in the process trying to duplicate the information Chiefmanzzz (talk) 09:00, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, well you haven't quite completed the nomination. You've added two templates to the talkpage and deleted the one about it being delisted! Not to worry though I've fixed that. Also, you shouldn't add that the status is "second opinion" because that's an option to add once a review has been started. Don't worry, it's complicated at first! You just need to add whichever "subtopic" the article is nominated in, to the template on the talkpage, and then follow the instructions at WP:GAN to list it as a nomination (not a second opinion). Basically, add  to the relevant subtopic. Let me know if you need any more help.-- Beloved  Freak  09:08, 21 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I think I got it now. You may want to double check thanks for your assistance
 * Yes, that looks fine. Good luck with the nomination!-- Beloved Freak  09:35, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Concord Repatriation General Hospital
Hi! I like the new photo. FYI, I moved it to the right to avoid some formatting problems.

Of more interest to me: You added "Category:Art Deco buildings in Australia". Do you have any photos of any of the Art Deco buildings that you can add to the page? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 08:26, 24 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi Yes I do But i dont have information to add to Wikipedia. THis is only a Category page. I have photos of Art deco buildings in Sydney CBD. Ill try and upload them to commons shortly


 * Sorry, I was ambiguous.
 * Do you have any photos of any of the Art Deco buildings of Concord Repatriation General Hospital that could be added to the Concord Repatriation General Hospital page? Pdfpdf (talk) 10:51, 24 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes but I want some better ones, Ill need to retake them on a nice sunny day.

I can understand that! In the interim, anything representative is better than nothing. When you have something better, you can replace them. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 10:54, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Song of Blades and Heroes


The article Song of Blades and Heroes has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of WP:notability. No independent WP:reliable sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 14:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:KFm-Family-descriptions3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KFm-Family-descriptions3.jpg, which you've sourced to INSUFFICIENT OTRS OVER 1 MONTH OLD. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 20:08, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kefir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Infected (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Fair Use in Australia discussion
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Micropython
Hello Chiefmanzzz I see you have made some edits to the MicroPython article. I had a question about one and began a discussion on the talk page here. Dbsseven (talk) 21:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Kline–Fogleman airfoil
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Kline–Fogleman airfoil, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.lap-publishing.com/catalog/details/store/cn/book/978-3-659-26600-3/enhancing-the-aerodynamic-performance-of-stepped-airfoils?search=stepped, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
 * Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Kline–Fogleman airfoil and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Kline–Fogleman airfoil, in their email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Kline–Fogleman airfoil. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Kline–Fogleman airfoil with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

See Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Kline–Fogleman airfoil saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Adam9007 (talk) 22:13, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Could it be a Wikipedia mirror? I notice that archive.org's only capture of it has the same date as your edit. Adam9007 (talk) 22:13, 29 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Note that removal of the copyright violating content that you added in 2014 required redaction of 93 versions of the article. Don't do this again. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 02:57, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:This is a logo for Stockfish Chess Engine.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:This is a logo for Stockfish Chess Engine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - January 2022
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Australian Institute of Project Management


A tag has been placed on Australian Institute of Project Management, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Blue Riband► 03:31, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Australian Institute of Project Management Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Australian Institute of Project Management Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 27 August 2022 (UTC)