User talk:Chikaritsa

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Muzika Poludelih has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.myspace.com/muzikapoludelih (matching the regex rule \bmyspace\.com). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:07, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Muzika Poludelih has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. P Carn (talk) 20:20, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to the page Muzika Poludelih has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see this page for instructions. Thank you. P Carn (talk) 20:21, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.myspace.com/muzikapoludelih (matching the regex rule \bmyspace\.com). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added  do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the  before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Muzika Poludelih. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. petiatil &raquo;user&raquo;speak 08:48, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Muzika Poludelih.  Anna Lincoln  09:02, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war&#32;at Muzika Poludelih. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. NJA (t/ c)  10:27, 4 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Would you care to explain why you were removing large sections of text from the article? Whether you're the creator or not, once submitted, the article is open to edits from anyone and everyone.  Also, can I ask if there is any type relationship between you and the subject of this article?  Thanks.  ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 12:47, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Muzika Poludleih
Pozdrav. Jedan sam od sam od nekoliko ljudi na Wikipediji (mislim da nas je samo trojica, da budem precizan) koji se bave clancima o srpskoj rock sceni. Da se ja pitam, clanak o ovom bendu ne bi smeo da se nadje ovde. Ovo je ENCIKLOPEDIJA, sto znaci da mesto ovde treba zasluziti. Wikipedia je ozbiljna institucija, a ne mesto za besplatno reklamiranje (za to imas Facebook, MySpace i stotine slicnih sajtova), a ovaj clanak me podseca na gomilu drugih koje smo do sad nominovali za brisanje i koji su sasvim zasluzeno nestali sa Wikipeije. Izgleda da si ti bivsi clan benda? Koliko puta smo imali ovakve slucajeve! U svakom slucaju, necu nominovati ovaj clanak za brisanje (barem ne dok ne utvrdim koliko je znacajan ovaj bend, ali mi nesto govori da nije previse), ali cu morati da ga dovedem u red. Ne menjaj izmene koje napravim! Ako zelis da ljudi ovaj bend shvate ozbiljno clanak o njima mora izgledati kao enciklopedijski clanak. Samo par napomena: 1. U clanku ne moze da stoji "Oi Voi!", ponavljam: ovo je ENCIKLOPEDIJA. 2. U clanku ne sme da stoji smajli. 3. U clanku ne smeju da stoje tri tacke, osim ako nisu deo citata. 4. Omoti albuma su nepotrebni, i u 99% slucajeva se ne ubacuju. Mogu da ostavim jedan, i predlazem da to bude omot prvog albuma. 5. Ne bi smelo da bude linkova do stranica o muzicarima. 6. Rasa Popov je clan benda? Mozda ga oni smatraju clanom, ali sam siguran da on za to i ne zna. 7. You Tube nije izdavacka kuca! 8. Ovom logou sa mravom nema mesta ovde. Bolje da si postavio neku sliku. Pravljenjem ovih izmena cu ti uciniti uslugu, ali verujem da ce clanak ubrzo biti obrisan i pomiri se sa tim. Zapitaj se zasto nema slicnih clanaka na Wikipedii. Mislis da si se ti prvi ovoga setio? Kao sto sam vec rekao: Wikipedia je ozbiljna institucija, a ako se nesto ovakvo pojavi na njoj to je zato sto je Wikipedia ogromna institucija. I jos jedna stvar: mislim da je jadno kada muzicari prave clnake sami o sebi. To su uradili i Zbogom Brus Li, sto je jos jadnije jer su oni relativno poznat bend. Treba pustiti fanove da govore o tebi, a ako to moras da uradis sam, onda i nisi bas veliki... Ostalocutanje (talk) 19:55, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Muzika Poludelih


The article Muzika Poludelih has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 11:23, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Muzika Poludelih
A tag has been placed on Muzika Poludelih requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Milosppf (talk) 13:56, 26 July 2010 (UTC)