User talk:Children&Parents

October 2015
Hello, I'm Mikeman67. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Parental alienation because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. mikeman67 (talk) 20:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Parental alienation, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 23:58, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Parental alienation
Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the Parental alienation article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Wikipedia and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 00:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Parental alienation. mikeman67 (talk) 18:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. mikeman67 (talk) 18:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Your recent editing history at Parental alienation shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. slakr \ talk / 02:33, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Warned per the edit-warring report
Hello Children&Parents. You've been warned per the report at WP:AN3. If you are hoping to take this dispute to mediation, you are well advised to first open a discussion at Talk:Parental alienation. Though you've made several reverts on the article, so far you've never commented on the talk page to explain your reasoning. Anything to do with Richard A. Gardner risks becoming controversial, so you are advised to follow our policies carefully and show a willingness to cooperate with others. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 13:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)