User talk:Chill doubt

Comment by NotGonnaTellYouMyName
Hey, it's that Madonna guy again. And I wanted to know if you were still mad. Please respond.

Hello
I have moved User:CHILL DOUBT/HEADER to User:Chill doubt/HEADER. That's your correct User name. Wikipedia is case sensitive. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:58, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) User:Zoe|(talk) 22:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Chill doubt! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego talk  17:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

64.131.21.148
Thank you for your support on User talk:64.131.21.148. You must have been watching New Changes! Hu 20:50, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

No worries (and yes !) ;-)  •C H ILL DO UBT•     21:53, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Newyorkbrad's RfA
Thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning, as well as for your kind comments accompanying your !vote. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 20:48, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

New user warning messages
Heya. Take a look at WP:UTM for the new warning messages. Things like test4 are being deprecated. --Brad Beattie (talk) 21:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for catching my page vandalism! Crazy vandals, asking me to stop un-doing their vandalism... -- Ipstenu ( talk | contribs ) 16:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome :-)  •C H ILL DO UBT•     10:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Userpage
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page! =) H4cksaw   (talk)  00:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

No worries :-)  •C H ILL DO UBT•     10:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Heads-up
Another user seems to have left you a message here. I was thinking about moving it to your talkpage, but considering the number of false statements and personal attacks involved, I'll leave it up to you as to how you'd like to handle it. FYI, Elonka 19:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Stubs
Thank you for placing stub on articles. If possible please use a specific stub tag. There is a list to help choose at WP:WSS/ST. Thank you  Ksbrown talk 13:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

NPWatcher
You've been approved to use NPWatcher. Please give Martinp23 any feature requests or bugs. He'll also happy to help if you have any problems running the program, or any questions :). Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if he's made a new release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist).  Finally, enjoy! -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 04:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Reverting Vandalism
You are Welcome..ø~Cometstyles~ø  (talk)

71.93.179.58
Man, this guy just doesn't give up does he?

And why haven't the Administrators blocked him yet? I reported him ages ago.....

-- TheChrisD™ 12:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Yea, it took them a while to get around to it, I think I've had 3 vandals on the backlog at once today.... -- TheChrisD™ 13:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Your sub page
Hi you had a sub-page named "photos" and its only use was vandilism (see here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Chill_doubt/Photos&action=history) thank you. Cocoaguy ここがいい contribstalkTodays Pick 22:02, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thats good also who is Htgeg he seems to be the user behind it, I reported him to AIV. Cocoaguy ここがいい contribstalkTodays Pick 22:11, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
I corrected vandalism on Vernon Robinson's page, and you reverted. What gives? 129.22.53.246 21:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism by User 72.10.124.202
Link to User's Talk Page

this user has received a number of warnings about vandalism and being blocked, but has not been blocked to date, yet continues to vandalize articles. what is the procedure for blocking that user? Whateley23 20:55, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Elonka 2
Thank you for taking the time to participate at the discussion in my Request for Adminship. Unfortunately the nomination did not succeed, but please rest assured that I am still in full support of the Wikipedia project. I listened carefully to all concerns, and will do my best to incorporate all of the constructive advice that I received, into my future actions on Wikipedia. If you can think of any other ways that I can further improve, please let me know. Best wishes, Elonka 03:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SchoolLogo06-master.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SchoolLogo06-master.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:40, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for help on watford
thanks for sorting out my poor attempt to combat teh vandalism on the Watford page. Ceeess 10:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

No problem! I have done something quite similar myself a number of times! Cheers '' •C H ILL DO UBT•     10:34, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

COOL SIG!
I LOVE YOUR SIGNATURE!!!!!!!!IslaamMaged126 19:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SchoolLogo06-master.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:SchoolLogo06-master.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:04, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Um Yea
Why did you say i vandalized the page, i don't even edit wiki just look at it so get your facts strait, i hate being accused of things that i did not do! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.130.148.138 (talk • contribs) 18:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The vandalism warning you are complaining about was issued back in March of this year, and was in response to the vandalism from someone on your IP address. You can see this yourself from this link. 

As dynamic IP addresses can be issued by Internet service providers to different people. I assume therefore that your internet service provider had, 9 months ago, assigned your current IP address to someone else. The best way to avoid confusion, such as you are clearly displaying, is to register for an account. That way, your edits will never be confused with anybody elses. Regards '' •C H ILL DO UBT•     19:07, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop reverting my edits.
Please stop mindlessly reverting my edits. Thanks Aliibn (talk) 13:36, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

I reverted poor quality edits which appear to have been where you have been disrupting wikipedia to make a point. Please read WP:POINT '' •C H ILL DO UBT•     13:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Sigh, I guess a Muslim can't get a break around here! Aliibn (talk) 13:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't care if you are an athiest, whether you worship a sky fairy or whether you believe in the Loch ness monster. I do care whether you disrupt wikipedia to make a point - IMO the point you are making is very weak, but that is just an aside. Playing a victim card does not impress me '' •C H ILL DO UBT•     13:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Sigh, it is quite obvious to me that you are mindlessly reverting all my edits as I disagreed with the Collective Wisdom of the Great White Fathers on the Talk:Muhammad page, pointing out that the images used aren't even accurate. Apparently, giving offense to Muslims comes as a higher priority to attempting accuracy for many editors here.
 * Rather than engage in the particulars of any edit I have done, you are simply blanking out everything I did. This suggests an agenda on your part. Aliibn (talk) 13:48, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I have reinstated images where you have removed them, and removed silly text to Albert the Great where you were trying, poorly, to make a point. I assume in relation to Talk:Muhammad? '' •C H ILL DO UBT•     13:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Zenobia
You keep insisting on maintaining the 19th century Orientalist painting on this page. Why not replace it with the one I suggested on the talk page/ (Sorry, I don't know how to do that). Aliibn (talk) 14:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your suggestion - Its better than us reverting each other and trading punches... Ill reply on the talk page. Cheers '' •C H ILL DO UBT•     14:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Elonka 3
Thank you for your participation in my RfA. It was definitely a dramatic debate that landed on WP:100, but ultimately was deemed a successful declaration of consensus, and I am now an admin. I definitely paid close attention to everything that was said in the debate, and, where possible, I will try to incorporate the (constructive) criticism towards being a better administrator. I'm taking things slowly for now, partially because of the holidays and all the off-wiki distractions. I'm working my way through the New admin school, carefully double-checking the relevant policies, and will gradually phase into the use of the new tools, with my main goals being to help out with various backlogs. I sincerely doubt you'll see anything controversial coming from my new access level. :) I also fully intend to keep on writing articles, as there are a few more that I definitely want to get to WP:FA status. If you do ever have any concerns about my activities as an administrator, I encourage you to let me know. My door is always open. Have a good new year, --Elonka 19:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Muhammad
Hi Chill doubt. While you are free to disagree with me, please do not accuse me of attempting to "censor" to "cater to religious sensibilities", especially when you have not shown the slightest awareness of the arguments I have forwarded. The longstanding consensus you cite has been upheld. Secondly, I am unsure as to why you restored TharkunColl's version in replacing the lead calligraphic image with a depiction, which enjoys no such consensus. ITAQALLAH  11:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Please be mindful of the contents you are removing in your reverts. You removed the pictures I had added here . --Be happy!! (talk) 02:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Captive State for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Captive State is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Captive State until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bobrayner (talk) 01:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:CHILL DOUBT Header.PNG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)