User talk:Chilled616

Use of genre/services fields in infoboxes
Hello Chilled, I would like to commend you on your recent edits in the restaurant-related articles. On quick note, please do not take out the genre of the restaurant from the infoboxes. Also, as a general rule of thumb, WP:Foodservice does not use the services field in infoboxes.

Keep up the good work!

--Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 04:40, 13 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you, much appreciated! As for the infoboxes, I was closely following the guidelines of Template:Infobox company. I actually prefer the genre there, as it made a clear distinction within the industry. Thank you for adjusting all of the genre and WP:Foodservice additions already. I will be sure not to add it in future edits. Is there a place where styling for restaurant-specific infoboxes is located? Chilled616 (talk) 14:24, 13 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I do not believe there is, its been awhile since I updated the page. The uses that I can recall for genre are:
 * Fast food
 * Fast casual
 * Family restaurant
 * Casual dining
 * Fine dining
 * Steak house
 * the full list is at types of restaurant.
 * --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 17:39, 13 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Haha, you're keeping an eye on the restaurant articles and myself pretty closely. I know you changed LongHorn Steakhouse's and Outback Steakhouse's genres to Steakhouse, but what are your thoughts about changing them to Casual dining, Steakhouse? I feel like both titles accurately reflect the genre. Also, on that basis, Steakhouse should be added to the types of restaurant article. Chilled616 (talk) 06:53, 14 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Go for it! There is no hard and fast rules as allot of these fall into multiple categories including public house. I have worked on most of those articles at one point or another and created most of those navigational templates on the page, and they are part of my 4000+ strong watchlist. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 19:58, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * My first! And thank you! The real credit goes out to you for all of the work you have spent contributing to every one of those articles. Every time I look in history... User:Jerem43 :)  Chilled616 (talk) 04:35, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Assessments
Hey Chilled, you can reassess articles you have worked on up to c-class based on the standards listed on the page. Once you wish to move into the B-Class area is when you should request an assessment. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 08:43, 18 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Ok, thank you! Chilled616 (talk) 17:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Ruby Tuesday
Hi. FYI Notification of change in RM proposal heading, I had to strike out "and the actress". It's a bold edit which I wouldn't normally make, but I am guessing that you were blindsided by a badly made stub. Feel free to remove the strike out. I don't feel strongly :) In ictu oculi (talk) 03:37, 19 May 2012 (UTC)\


 * Let me chime in here, Chilled. Thanks for your note about my critique of the details at that RM. Please don't feel singled out for a stern lecture! It's quite tricky getting those details right, and we are all still learning about Google. It changes its ways without notice. It is common for those ways to be ignored at RMs, and I like to give a little instruction when I can. It is refreshing to have it acknowledged.
 * Best wishes with polishing the article up to a high standard. If you need any advice or assistance, just let me know.
 * N oetica Tea? 08:08, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * N oetica Tea? 08:08, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Ruby Tuesday GA nom
Hey, I saw you nominated Ruby Tuesday as a good article. I am not the reviewer, but you might want to take a look at some of the other Category:GA-Class Food and drink articles to see where you will need to go on that article. I would recommend you start on the lead. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 16:20, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The original reviewer was blocked a year for incompetence. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:09, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)