User talk:Chimeric Glider/Archive 1

Good List, But
The Master Redyva really likes your list (& is impressed) but the Master Redyva thinks the greatest might be Stanley Kubrick, Martin Scorsese, Oliver Stone, George Lucas, Francis Ford Coppola. Master Redyva  ♠  June 29, 2024.
 * I loved The Virgin Suicides, but I might have liked Lost in Translation more and I have yet to see Marie Antoinette.  I hope you have a good holiday weekend.   Master Redyva   ♠  June 29, 2024.
 * The code below will add the bouncing logo. Delete it if you do not want it here and add to another of your user pages if you want it there.  Master Redyva   ♠  June 29, 2024.



RE: Administrator
Well, to become an administrator, first you'll need to get more edits, broad experience on Wikipedia in what you edit, get involved in some policy making, and then run for an RFA. This page will have a lot more information on it, Administrators. Darth Griz98 03:39, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Greatest Directors
FYI, your list is incomplete without Sam Peckinpah and Sergio Leone. Kubrick wouldn't hurt either. Hope this helps. Tparameter (talk) 01:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Leone was offered the chance to do the Godfather. He turned it down. If you like westerns at all, Leone is a good one. Peckinpah, well, he was sort of an eccentric - a bit of a loose cannon as well. He had some great movies though. For Kubrick, try to watch 2001 Space Odyssey. Anyway, I too focus a bit on directors, as I've found that it's easier to find good movies that way. Tparameter (talk) 05:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Welcome
 Welcome! Hey, welcome to WikiProject Films! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add User WikiProject Films to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:
 * Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].


 * The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for February has been published.  March's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:


 * Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
 * Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
 * Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia.  Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films March 2008 Newsletter
The March 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

DRV process
Hello,

Thanks for listing the DRV, but did you forget to notify the deleting admin (in this case User:David Gerard)? It's generally considered one of the standard steps. You can use Template:DRVNote if you like, or just type up a brief note to that effect.

Thanks, — xDanielx T/C\R 23:36, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Please consider taking the AGF Challenge
I would like to invite you to consider taking part in the AGF Challenge which has been proposed for use in the RfA process by User: Kim Bruning. You can answer in multiple choice format, or using essay answers, or anonymously. You can of course skip any parts of the Challenge you find objectionable or inadvisable.--Filll (talk) 21:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

I apologize if my comments seemed harsh
I explained why on the talk page but thought it was worth dropping by your place to say the same. I've seen the other copyright law conversations there and where they go and I very much want to avoid getting caught up in a similar conversation. Not suggesting you feel otherwise but instead I'm just explaining my reasons. Cheers! Angry Christian (talk) 21:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Friday the 13th
First, no reliable source has reported that filming is underway. Second, there isn't enough information to support a separate article at the moment. All of the relevant information is already on the franchise page. Several editors have reverted the edits of another editor for doing the same thing, and he was blocked for violating the three revert rule. Please understand that the film guidelines backup the redirection of that title.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  23:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


 * It's not a huge deal, it just happened to happen immediately following Halloweenluver's disruption (where they reverted, against several other editors, something like 10 times, ignoring any message on their talk page). I wasn't sure if you were aware of everything, and the craziness Halloweenluver ignoring several of us was just making me annoyed, and that was why I was a little uncouthe in my attitdue (I apologize for that).   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  19:32, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films April 2008 Newsletter
The April 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Fortean offense
I think one of the problems isn't with Charles Fort himself (who seems to stay on the sidelines) but those who promote his compilations as somehow reaching "beyond" the points for which they are intended. His jocular and humorous approach to knowledge in science provides much needed levity (ala Weekly World News) but the problem is when people misinterpret him and take him seriously. Fortean Times does just that, for example. They approach forteana as though it is serious instead of absurd. ScienceApologist (talk) 15:59, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Worldview test
You asked about this test on User talk:MastCell. He's undergoing a high-colonic and binging on Diet Mountain Dew, so he cannot be bothered. So I thought I'd help out. You can take the test here. Once you're done with the test, it spits out the results in wikicode, and you can cut and paste it to your user page. There might be one or two formatting issues, but just look at my user page, and you can see how I did it. I hope this helps. Orange Marlin Talk• Contributions 06:30, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Splitting off sections
Hi, I wanted to explain more fully why I had to revert your deletions at Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. Even though you split the material into a new article, we can't just delete the entire section from the new article. Some of the content (the most relevant) should be kept in the current article, along with a pointer to the new article that you created. This way important info is kept in the main, while a more full explanation is available from the spin-off articles. Thanks! Doc  Tropics  20:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

No worries, you had the right idea and the spin-off is actually one I had suggested previously. Now that you've put it into place we can work on trimming more excess from the main. Thanks for understanding : )  Doc   Tropics  20:52, 3 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi, as I've noted on the talk page we have to split using the approach of WP:SUMMARY which means having the information adequately summarised in the main article. The "people presented in the film" section is tricky, as the ostensible focus of the film is these claims to have been "expelled" and Stein misrepresents each of them. A blank statement to that effect is unconvincing, and so enough detail is needed to show the claims and the documented facts. Most of them have their own articles, and Steinberg has a specific article about his "controversy", so excess detail can go in these articles rather than s sub-article, but we still need enough information on each to present an realistic overview for readers who can't be expected to go off to a sub article. .. dave souza, talk 21:09, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films May 2008 Newsletter
The May 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:48, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

RE: Movies
I admit, I've only seen a few of the ones on you page. In fact, I've only seen some of the "Films to watch" movies. Bella and Expelled were really good. If fact, those were the only two on you page I'd seen. I can't wait to see Narnia 2, and I will probably soon see Indiana Jones 4, Iron Man, Kung Fu Panda, WALL-E, Fireproof, etc. If you want to discuss further, I'm available, but I won't be on much (if any) on Sunday. Cheers -- ✰ American Eagle   06:19, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

The Clash
You nominated The Clash (awesome band) for Good Article Nomination, yet the article is already a Good Article (see the article's talk page. Cheers, Kodster (heLLo ) (Me did that ) 20:52, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Didn't pay attention to the talk page. =P Apologies. Agreed it is an awesome band! Chimeric Glider (talk) 21:41, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Juno GA nom
Hi, I see you just nominated Juno (film) for GA status. As one of several main contributors to the article, however, I'd really appreciate it if you withdrew the nomination because quite honestly the article isn't up to scratch yet. There are numerous issues that need to be taken care of before it takes a shot at GAN such as adding inmissing references, polishing prose, rewriting lots of info and expanding some sections like the lead and critical reception - but GA is definitely a goal for the article in the future. Thanks in advance! — 97198 talk  03:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, scratch that. If you feel like dropping by, join in the discussion at Talk:Juno (film). — 97198 talk  09:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Awesome; thanks for helping out :P — 97198 <font color="#000000">talk  07:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

My page
Hmm, I might have gotten some ideas (can't really remember, though), but I didmy page myself. It isn't hard, I just put the boxtop template to put my UBX's to the right, and all my text goes on the left. All the baseball standings and my subpages are just templates by other users. It's very simple. Cheers -- -- A<font color="lightsteelblue">m e r i<font color="lightsteelblue">c  a   † <font color="lightsteelblue">al k 01:51, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * So, how was Bella? Cheers -- -- A<font color="lightsteelblue">m e r i<font color="lightsteelblue">c  a   † <font color="lightsteelblue">al k 06:31, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your comment
Hi Chimeric! I saw your comment at the talk page of Dave souza, and replied on it. I thought I'd let you know. Cheers, Face 19:33, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. I notified you because I thought you wanted something similiar for your own page. Cheers, Face 13:11, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Deletion review for Image:Syriana.jpg
I've restored this image, it appears a bug in the MediaWiki software was to blame for this. In the future though, please try and contact the deleting administrator, or any administrator before starting DRVs - it's just common courtesy around here. :-) <small style="background:#fff;border:#daa520 1px solid;color:#000;padding:0px 3px 1px 4px;white-space:nowrap">east<big style="color:#090">. 718 at 18:15, April 27, 2008
 * No problem at all. :-) You just seemed to be a newer user, so I figured it'd be best to inform you of what best practices are. Happy editing! <small style="background:#fff;border:#8b0000 1px solid;color:#000;padding:0px 3px 1px 4px;white-space:nowrap">east<big style="color:#090">. 718 at 01:14, April 29, 2008

Urinary Incontinence

I find your rudeness astonishing.

Are you licensed to practice medicine? If not, what makes you qualified to call my cure for urinary incontinence "making fun"?

I suffered from this disease and now don't because I threw away all the medicines that had turned me into a zombie and simply stopped ingesting liquids.

If anything, you're the one making fun of this dreaded disease.

Modern medical treatment is based on the idea of prescribing drugs. Medical professionals have no incentive to simply tell the sufferer "Reduce your fluid intake 75%"

Yet the Landers Method works -- and why wouldn't it?

A bladder working 75% less can rest and repair itself.

Or perhaps you have a more effective method?

If you do, I'm sure the millions of people around the world who suffer from urinary incontinence would love to hear it. If not what possible objection could you have to letting them know about a cure that has worked for me?

el —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricland (talk • contribs) 15:09, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Japanese-style curry chicken fried rice
OK with you if I add to your AfD Spanish seafood fried rice which also had the PROD removed, and probably Italian seafood fried rices as well? May as well sort them all out together. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

You nominated to delete my article
This was unjustified as the article Makers and Takers had been alive for a mere 90 seconds before your nomination. I was editing and creating it as you made the nomination, so please rescind it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tsante (talk • contribs) 01:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

REDYVA
User:REDYVA was blocked after a using a string of abusive sockpuppet accounts and repeated violations of WP:NPA. Gwernol 19:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Rollback granted
After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! –<font face="Verdana"> xeno cidic ( talk ) 15:04, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback may be removed at any time.

WikiProject Films June 2008 Newsletter
The June 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Wkunstler.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Wkunstler.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

The reason it is orphaned is that I replaced it with a free image of Kunstler. Thanks for uploading the fair use one, whose rationale was clearly valid, providing there was no free version. -Seidenstud (talk) 03:10, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Film importance scale
Since Girolamo appears occupied, I wanted to let you know that the importance scale has indeed been abolished. It has been substituted with WP:FILMCORE. — Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:07, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films July 2008 Newsletter
The July 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:02, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections
Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 03:49, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter
The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:44, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Sinkthebismarck.jpg
Hello, I've added the original theatrical poster of Sink the Bismarck! to the page, so I imagine the DVD cover is redundant now. I've listed Image:Sinkthebismarck.jpg at. I hope you don't mind. Thanks. Bob talk 09:18, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Questionnaire
As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:56, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Robertaltman.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Robertaltman.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   20:37, 19 July 2010 (UTC)