User talk:Chimichanga789

June 2017
Hello, I'm Mistbreeze. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Hannah Casey— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mistbreeze (talk) 03:53, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of HannahCasey for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HannahCasey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/HannahCasey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to HannahCasey. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of HannahCasey


A tag has been placed on HannahCasey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. TheSandDoctor (talk) 23:08, 1 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Regarding Speedy Deletion


 * Hello, Chimichanga789. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting one or more of the Categories for Speedy Deletion. See the message above this one for more information about why this was deleted.


 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. 


 * Any deficiencies should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.


 * If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process.


 * You can make test edits in your sandbox.


 * You may find this tool useful for finding sources: Google custom search


 * Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources . Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template  at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

 YOU CAN ASK FOR HELP AT THE TEAHOUSE Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:41, 2 June 2017 (UTC)