User talk:Chimpanzeelover

Alphabetical order and such
Whenever you see a list on any Wikipedia article, check to see if it's in alphabetical order (generally by last name) or chornological order, for that matter. If it is, put new entries in the list in that order. Also, any list that has "notable" in its description should only include people of things that have articles on Wikipedia, otherwise we consider them "non-notable". Finally, per WP:V, all facts on Wikipedia are subject to requiring verification by way of a citation from a reliable source. BMK (talk) 01:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hybristophilia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. None of your additions were sourced, and none of their articles had any mention of hybristophilia related activity. I've trimmed all of the unsupported examples (yours and others). Meters (talk) 18:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hybristophilia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Stop doing this. Provide sources or leave them out of the article. Meters (talk) 21:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Hybristophilia. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop adding unsourced names to this article. Meters (talk) 20:54, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hybristophilia. Meters (talk) 05:34, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Miss E... So Addictive.  Rob van  vee  09:03, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dirty rap (July 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dirty rap and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dirty_rap Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dirty_rap reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:49, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dirty rap


Hello, Chimpanzeelover. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Dirty rap".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 05:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Thurston High School. Stop making improperly sourced edits. You have had multiple warnings about this and yet I see that you continue to do so. Making a statement in an edit summary is not acceptable sourcing. Wikipedia is never considered a reliable source. Claiming in an edit summary that your source is another Wikipedia article is doubly wrong. Meters (talk) 06:36, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Thurston High School shooting. One final chance before you get reported. See my comments in the previous warning. Meters (talk) 00:47, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 05:11, 6 March 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 18:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Pass That Dutch.  Rob van  vee  15:23, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

April 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Come Baby Come, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 00:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism, as you did at Hot Boyz (song). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Brown Haired Girl (talk) • (contribs) 05:41, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:56, 10 December 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 00:27, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I Love New York (season 1), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hasta la vista ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/I_Love_New_York_%28season_1%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/I_Love_New_York_%28season_1%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:37, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm Flori4nK. I noticed that in this edit to List of mass shootings in the United States, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Flori4nK T A L K  20:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of mass shootings in the United States, you may be blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 21:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of mass shootings in the United States, you may be blocked from editing. Jorm (talk) 21:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * [[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to '''being blocked from editing


 * Disruptive edit March 10
 * Saschaporsche (talk) 08:39, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Another disruptive edit on April 17th; see here. Saschaporsche (talk) 08:42, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:57, 19 April 2020 (UTC)