User talk:China88888888

Welcome!

Hello, China88888888, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to 2015 FIBA Asia Championship does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! &#124; Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  14:34, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

December 2015
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to 2015 FIBA Asia Championship— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:22, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Following up on this, you've said you've read WP:RS. While I don't expect anyone to read that page in its entirety, the WP:NEWSORG section is rather appropriate: most of the sources in that section satisfy that requirement. It needs balancing, yes, but the way to do it is not via wholesale censorship, but rather, adding the other view of the incident, which the article is sorely lacking, which WP:BIASED explains. – H T  D  16:36, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I also see that you've been reverted three times by three different people. If you do revert for a fourth time to your version, it would be a violation of WP:3RR and would be duly reported. – H T  D  16:40, 26 December 2015 (UTC)