User talk:Chinggism

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place   on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dr Debug (Talk) 21:01, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Jean Marc Roc Productions Far East Video has been marked for deletion
Please comment on Articles for deletion/Jean Marc Roc Productions Far East Video. Do not remove the notice from the original page, since that is considered vandalism. Dr Debug (Talk) 21:17, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Removing an AFD notice is considered vandalism. And you removed despite the warning after removing the speedy.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Looking at the way this article and others I have submitted are deleted, and at the way the areas of Wikipedia I have submitted to seem to be the private preserve of a small bunch of commercial, main stream pornographers. It seems that these blatant commercial intrests are using wikipedia to stop any independent artist contributions, I believe the deletion is biased and political in nature. Since when is any of the "protected" listings that are allowed in these areas of wikipedia Just google Asiaerotica and get a reference or investigate the history of what Asiaerotica does and stands for. It is EXACTLY this type of censorship that will prevent this section from being any more than a protected advertisment for what are obviously vested and commercially related intrests. If the editors of Wikipedia do not respond to this challenge, then they are in collusion with comercial pornographers as opposed to widening ideas and sources of informattion and points of view. Far East Video (Asiaerotica) has made a significant contribution to this field as well as being the first production company to consistanly produce Gonzo erotica since 1983 in Asia. Asiaerotica has been on the web since Feb 1996 and is part of the Wayback machines archive, was Adult site of the day and recieved numerous notations from websites and writers who have long since vanished into the flotsam of the internet, where no doubt a lot of the examples proffered here will return. The productions have been written up in Penthouse, High Society, Hustler, The Boston Free Press, Screw Magazine and many other industry related publications. While its owner, Jean Marc Roc shuns the Los Angeles based porn industry, and does not seek to affiliate or be considered part of that ilk, Wikipedia should not be hijacked by those vested interests. Indeed, it would seem to me that an independant, iconoclastic, and eclectic producer with an intresting point of view that is novel and thought out should be of interest to those that seek knowledge and ideas. Ideas and a thoughtful point of view is EXACTLY what is lacking in each and every featured example in this section of the Wiki. If these facts and these efforts are continually "edited" out, then it is an example of partisan bias and it should be stopped. An enclycopedia is about knowledge often interesting and obscure, not just a private little world where those that have an obvious intrest in these porn merchants gets to tout their wares. Asiaerotica is not onscure, it is a statement that is kept on the sidelines of porn on purpose in an effort to make a new genre where it is most badly needed.

Sign your comments
Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages. Typing four tildes after your comment ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) will insert a signature showing your username and a date/time stamp, which makes it clear who said what, and when. Thank you. James084 23:43, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Looking at the way this article and others I have submitted and at the way the areas of Wikipedia I have submitted to seem to be the private perserve of a small bunch of commercial, main stream pornographers using wikipedia to stop any independent artist contributions, I think tha tthe deletion is biased and political in nature. Since when is any of the "protected" listings that are allowed in these areas of wikipedia any more worthy of consideration by those interested in these subjects than the ones I offer. It is EXACTLY this type of censorship that will prevent this section from being any more than a protected advertisment for wat are obviously vested and commercially related intrests. If the editors of Wikipedia do not respond to this challenge, then theyr are collusive in this. Far East Video (Asiaerotica) has made a significant contribution to this field as well as being the first production company to consistanly produce Gonzo erotica since 1983 in Asia. Asiaerotica has been on the web since Feb 1996 and is part of the Wayback machines archive, was Adult site of the day and recieved numerous notations from websites and writers who have long since vanished into the flotsam of the internet, where no doubt a lot of the examples profered here will return. The productions have been written up in Penthouse, High Society, Hustler, The Boston Free Press, Screw Magazine and many other industry related publications. While its owner, Jean Marc Roc shuns the Los Angeles based porn industry, anddoes not seek to affiliate or be considered part of that ilk, Wikipwedia should not be hijacked by those vested interests. Indeed, it is an independant, producer withan intresting point of view that is interesting and thought out that should be of intrests to those that seek knowledge and ideas. Ideas and a thoughtful point of view is EXACTLY what is lacking in each and every featured example in this section of the Wiki. f these facts and these efforts are continually "edited" out, then it is an example of partisan bias and it should be stopped.

Re: Your Email
Chinggism, I have no desire to continue correspondence with you regarding your disagreement with the concensus vote on the issue of Articles for deletion/Asiaerotica.com. The decision stands, the public has spoken. Also, the issue is from the 12th of February, which is far in the past. If the Wikipedia community deems your article unworthy of inclusion, then there must have been a reason to do so. Perhaps it read like an ad, perhaps it was unnotable. I realise that my comment of "Just because you think it is notable doesn't make it notable" may have offended you, but it's the truth. If you wish to bring up this issue again, you may do so, but I would leave your harsh responses at the door. More can be achieved with calm words. Kareeser|Talk! 03:05, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do edit the closed AFD discussions, please comment on the talk page. I have moved your comments to the talk page. If you would like to have the Asiaerotica.com article restored please read Undeletion policy and take the actions designated on that page. Thanks!  J\/\/estbrook  Talk  VSCA  14:15, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

February 2010
JohnCD (talk) 21:36, 26 February 2011 (UTC)