User talk:Chinokins2

Speedy deletion nomination of Sack of Budapest
Hello Chinokins2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sack of Budapest for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ueutyi (talk) 19:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Sack of Budapest
Do you have plans to expand this article? As it stands, it provides insufficient information to remain as a standalone article, and should probably be redirected to Second Mongol invasion of Hungary. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:33, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Sack of Budapest for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sack of Budapest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sack of Budapest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:43, 6 January 2016 (UTC)