User talk:Chip.berlet/sandbox

Let's start from here. We can cut out alot of the puffery. I'd eliminate some of the advocacy where it sounds like the article is actually pushing for a certain cause instead of specifically writing about you.Some of the things just seem to lack context. Let's go sextion by section just to keep it simple. We may need some help with verification. Basically if it's not internet accessible and free I can't verify. Noting your COI I think it might be inadvisable to have you verify it. Anyway what do you think? We can start wit the background section.Serialjoepsycho (talk) 07:06, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Critics
What I think would work here is turning it into a reception section. For a comparison look at Steven_Emerson. I think that what's in the current article is fair but it needs balance similar to the linked article here.Serialjoepsycho (talk) 10:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)