User talk:Chip123456/Archive 2

Not done template
Hi Chip123456! Sorry for starting that discussion there. I just wanted to tell you that it might not be appropriate using Template:Not done, since WP:RFR says,"Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add ✅ or ❌ respectively under the request with their comments." Hope you didn't had any problems with me removing that template. Regarss, ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 17:19, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No, I didn't although I would appreciate if in future you do contact me before changing comments. See here. Also this was clearly explained on the page. Best --Chip123456 (talk) 17:24, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hmm, Sorry again. :) Lets just end it up here, its just getting too big over a small issue. Regards, :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 17:28, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, I suppose so. There are more urgent things that need to be sorted out on Wikipedia than small things like this. I just wanted you to know that it is considered bad practice on Wikipedia. Take a look at the warning templates for it, I would usually give one but I understood you had more than good intentions! Best, --Chip123456 (talk) 17:46, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hmm, that was a pretty important note, will take care of that, for sure. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 17:49, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, as said it's no 'biggy' but I just don't want you to get in trouble for it later down the line! --Chip123456 (talk) 17:51, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

What was it that ..?
What was it that brought me to your notice in the first place? -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 19:35, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I was telling you off for MOS:BOLD! and then you gave me coffee so I forgave you and then the sun has shined ever since ! --Chip123456 (talk) 19:39, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, that is all true ... but ... you have not actually answered my question. Some matter must have drawn me to your attention,  What was it?  -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 19:48, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I also told you after you were granted RB rights that you look at WP:RBK and WP:VAND. See here. --Chip123456 (talk) 19:56, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, that is also all true ... but ... you have not actually answered my question. Some matter must have drawn me to your attention,  What was it?  -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 21:26, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The socking IP, the new UBX, I don't know then!!!! --Chip123456 (talk) 06:45, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey! What's with the quadruple exclamation marks, when only one should ever be used ... bad ... worse than overdoing the emboldening. -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 07:35, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Is that a policy? And I think the bold is worse! --Chip123456 (talk) 15:55, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Ha ha ... you would, of course. I've just noticed that you followed me over to Wilkins' place.  --Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 17:32, 14 May 2012 (UTC) Postscript: read the edit summary!
 * No, I was going to ask him something but saw that comment from the 'professor' and I was laughing so much I forgot what I was going to ask! --Chip123456 (talk) 18:14, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Did you read my p.s. above? -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 18:37, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yep, I did. If you have time, please comment on my editor review! Positive & negative (but nice :)) feedback if you could!--Chip123456 (talk) 18:41, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * To the former, "did you understand it?" – to the latter, "I do not understand what it is."
 * -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 18:48, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

To the former 'yes' to the latter 'it is a review to see how I'm doing on Wikipedia Editor review/Chip123456'. --Chip123456 (talk) 18:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Are you not curious? Which articles have you edited mostly?  -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 18:58, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry curious about what? CONFUSED! And the second question, I just do bits and bobs and of course, anti-vandal work. --Chip123456 (talk) 19:30, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * @ CONFUSED! You spotted me, first, on the 'Permissions' request page on May 3.
 * All this nonsense above here, namely ... "The socking IP, the new UBX, I don't know then!!!!" ... were much later (last week)
 * Why the evasion? --Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 10:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, at least we go to the bottom of that one!--Chip123456 (talk) 15:20, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Ha ha ... I have only today noticed this comment.
 * A late reaction from me, but, in view of what's been happening to me today, all the better for it!
 * Thanks to your good nature, my equilibrium is rapidly being restored. You are a breath of fresh air in this environment.  -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 16:43, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you The bold is needed! --Chip123456 (talk) 16:48, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Have you seen this?
I have been, and still am being plagued, by some damned individual on the Indian Sub-continent. I am fed up to the back teeth with him. -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 21:11, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * What? I'm taking it that you didn't write that?--Chip123456 (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes. -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 21:29, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * So, are you fed up with Huggle.......:).--Chip123456 (talk) 06:46, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No, it, like STiki, and igloo, are excellent tools to help us in the ever-increasing fight against vandals. I am fed up with the hounding that I am receiving daily from some Indian who attacks me whenever I foul up (which is not that often, in my opinion) and afterwards I write an apology to the editor involved.
 * He originally invaded my Talk page, uninvited – a with attitude –  and behaved appallingly.  -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk)
 * 10:30, 16 May 2012 (UTC) POSTSCRIPT: Please read the Edit summary to this posting!
 * I agree, you don't mess up that often and you leave a note in the relevant place. If I were you, I would ignore them and simply revert it. --Chip123456 (talk) 15:10, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. I appreciate it.  I'm feeling a bit frayed round the edges today thanks to him.
 * -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 16:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem. I think I have a suspected, although I am not convinced socker on my TP see 'want to be friends'--Chip123456 (talk) 16:18, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Just been over and looked at both pages. Ugh.  Keep well out of it.  Liked your message there and here (below) many thankyous.  Cheers,  -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 16:32, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It's the best thing to do! Best, --Chip123456 (talk) 16:35, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Archives
Have you thought about archiving your talk page? Dan653 (talk) 00:48, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Funny you should say that, Dan. I tried to do it yesterday morning but it started to say something like 'my account is Cluebot III'. I don't have a 'clue' see what I did there how to do it, would you be able to explain how to set one up please. Best,--Chip123456 (talk) 06:45, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * If you want automatic archiving by bot, there are several available. will indeed do this, but I've never set that one up. Another popular one (which I have set up several times) is the MiszaBot family, which comes in several flavours for different types of talk page. The one for User talk: pages is, and instructions are at User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo. For an example of one which I did recently, see . You wouldn't use this code exactly as I did, because there are two items which must be altered; you can amend more if you wish.
 * So, for example, if you wanted threads on this page to archive automatically after 28 days, you could use:


 * Put that code near the top of this page: typically, it goes after the last banner, but all of it must be before the first heading. The order of the parameters is immaterial, but those in User:MiszaBot/config must be arranged one per line.
 * Of the various parameters, the ones which you might like to adjust are:
 * old(28d) and 28 - the thread will be archived 28 days after the last date in it. So, to archive after 56 days, set old(56d) in User:MiszaBot/config and 56 in.
 * 100K - this controls how big an archive can get before a new one is started
 * 4 - this means that a minimum of four threads are to be left on the page by the bot, even if some of them are older than the limit set by algo. So, if you want to keep a minimum of six threads, set 6
 * 1 - if you only want archiving to occur when there are, say, three threads suitable for archive, set 3
 * archiveheader - you can choose any of several different templates to be automatically put at the top of the archive pages. The popular ones are shown in the 'Navigational templates "Header bars"' row of Template:Warchivenav; note that some need parameters to work properly. You can see an example of at the top of archives like User talk:Thumperward/Archive 70.
 * Leave the other parameters alone. The bot may periodically amend them, or even change the order; don't worry about that. -- Red rose64 (talk) 13:11, 16 May 2012 (UTC)


 * ✅ Thank you. --Chip123456 (talk) 15:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * What you did looks fine - that is, if archiving after 16 days was your intention.
 * Anyway, you might be wondering why nothing's happened yet: MiszaBot III runs once a day, kicking off at about 12:30 UTC; and because it doesn't do more than one or two per minute, it takes several hours to complete (it's just finished today's run). It goes through users in alphabetic order, and today it got to the C's at about 13:40, and the D's at about 14:10 - so you missed today's run by about 90 minutes. You should find threads disappearing into User talk:Chip123456/Archive 1 some time tomorrow afternoon. -- Red rose64 (talk) 21:06, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was my intention, I thought 28 was too long! Thank you for informing me, noted. --Chip123456 (talk) 06:48, 17 May 2012 (UTC)