User talk:Chip123456/Archive 37

But I explained why I made the revert.
It had been a month on the list, as indicated by the hidden date, it says: "These fighters have been released from their UFC contracts, or announced their retirement, over the course of the last month. If their release has not been announced then they have been listed here based upon their removal from the UFC's rosters."

Can you please revert the edit? It was in the right, I promise, I can't do it because I don't wanna break 3RR. 173.171.83.140 (talk) 08:45, 28 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Please do not post various comments in different talk pages. Things can get confusing. Please discuss on the articles talk page.--Chip123456 08:50, 28 October 2013 (UTC)


 * OK I posted there, can you please respond to it? It will help you understand the situation better. Either way, after you respond can you please revert to my last edit, it was in the right I assure you. I'm still clueless as to why it was reverted when it was explained on the respective page how it works. 173.171.83.140 (talk) 08:56, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Humanism
Oops - sorry! Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:49, 29 October 2013 (UTC)


 * No problem. We've all done it with Rollback. Happy editing!--Chip123456 13:07, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Lambeth Academy
Hi Chip

I work for Lambeth Academy and I have been asked to update and tidy up our entry in Wikipedia.

This includes amending the core information held on the academy and removing what we consider to be erroneous information in order to get back to a point where we can start to develop the page again.

Please reinstate my changes.

Thanks

Graeme Winn Assistant Business Support Manager Lambeth Academy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Winnsworld (talk • contribs) 09:48, 30 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, your intentions may fall foul of our strict conflict of interest policy, prohibiting people who have strong connections to an organisation, in this case the academy, from editing. Please have a look over the policy, and discuss any substantial changes on the articles talk page. Please do not hesitate to ask any more questions.--Chip123456 09:56, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)