User talk:Chipermc

Welcome!
Hello, Chipermc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! —Stepheng3 (talk) 21:22, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fundamental Error has been accepted
 Fundamental Error, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  Onel 5969  TT me 18:03, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

May 2017
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to United States v. Baker— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:11, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Hello CAPTAIN RAJU. Although I appreciate the work you provide Wiki to prevent vandalism, please re-revert United States v. Baker with my edits.  That article has an incorrect title.  The correct title is United States v. Alkhabaz per the courts. (See https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15452781282069577866 ). I believe the bot you used recognized the name changes I made and it did not align with the article title, so this is why my edits were reverted.  However, my edits were consistent with the court documents.  I have also requested moving that article to the correct name using the Requested moves process and it already has received support.  Thank you again for your work to improve Wikipedia, but please reincorporate my edits into that article. chipermc (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Let's let the dust settle on the RM first. The article at present is a hybrid of an article on the district court case, United States v. Baker, 890 F. Supp. 1375 (E.D. Mich. 1995); and an article on the court of appeals case, United States v. Alkhabaz, 104 F.3d 1492 (6th Cir. 1997). Once that's settled by consensus, we can clean up the article consistent with the chosen direction. TJRC (talk) 22:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

United States v. Williams (1951); ABA journal note
Hi, in United States v. Williams (1951), you had the sentence: One of them was derived from the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and was designed to "secure to all persons the equal protection of the laws."; with a supporting cite ""American Bar Association Journal". 0747-0088. vol. 37 (Aug 1951): 604. August 1951."

I've found that article, and updated the note more specifically, to identify the author and title, as well as provide a link where it can be obtained:



But I see nothing in the ABA Journal note that supports that sentence. Did you quote the right source? Can you verify, please? TJRC (talk) 19:27, 31 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Hello, I mixed my reference 4 and 5 when creating the article. I just fixed by swapping the two references to their correct places and I added the url for the ABA Journal reference.  The reference to the Civil Rights Act of 1866 was directly from the court case on page 73 and not from the ABA article.  Thanks for the note. --chipermc (talk) 02:22, 04 June 2017 (UTC)

Requested moves, and casting a !vote on a proposal you yourself made
Hi, I see you've added Support !votes on your various RMs, e.g., here. You actually shouldn't do that. The nominating editor is assumed to support his own proposal (whether on an RM prpoposal, a deletion discussion or any other proposal). By adding a Suppport line, you double-count yourself and overstate the support. I've stricken it in the Morgan case; but would you please corrrect yourself on the others? Thanks. TJRC (talk) 23:14, 5 June 2017 (UTC)


 * I was trying to use the "vote early, vote often" principle, but I guess that doesn't apply here. :)  I have changed the others.  Thanks for the information so it will help prevent this mistake in the future. chipermc (talk) 23:38, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Where do you think you are? Chicago? :) TJRC (talk) 23:57, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

fyi
I had left you a note on an old comment (but it was deleted, so fyi) .. here. --2604:2000:E016:A700:7943:2675:5B48:2161 (talk) 07:55, 14 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I'm not sure why the regular editor reverted my edits in the article on Jimmy Garoppolo. Although Garoppolo's photo when he was with the Patriots was slightly better in quality, he is now with the 49ers. It didn't make sense to me (and apparently a lot of other people) to use his Patriots photo as the primary photo. However, it looks like both photos are on the page now, and I also see where his 49ers photo is now his primary photo.  (I'm not a 49ers fan, but I was at the game and took that photo. So, I'm pleased for selfish reasons; however, I expect that someone in the future will get a better photo of him and replace my contribution.  I'm ok with that.)

A page you started (Carpenter v. Murphy) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Carpenter v. Murphy.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Very nice article, however, the last paragraph in the Background section, and the entire Statement of the case section need to be rewritten in your own words. Right now it is a copyvio, see this link. Take a look at WP:PARAPHRASE. But keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 Onel 5969  TT me 12:25, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Bright Machines
Hello, Chipermc,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Bright Machines! I edit here too, under the username Rosguill}} and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed,Rosguill talk 21:09, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)