User talk:Chiraq3456

April 2023
Hello, I'm Riverbend21. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Paddy Pimblett have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Riverbend21 (talk) 19:20, 9 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Ok Chiraq3456 (talk) 20:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paddy Pimblett. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Riverbend21 (talk) 19:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)


 * What have I done now Chiraq3456 (talk) 19:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * why did you remove my edit it was a controversial decision Chiraq3456 (talk) 19:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Excuse me can you respond Chiraq3456 (talk) 19:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Hadal (talk) 20:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)


 * what are you talking about Chiraq3456 (talk) 20:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * yo Chiraq3456 (talk) 20:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * what have I done Chiraq3456 (talk) 20:22, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Blocked temporarily
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. I was trying to add an actual serial killer to the list and kind of messed up I had actually removed my edit at the time I was banned Re: relevant edits, some of which are potentially libelous, see List of serial killers in the United States, Paddy Pimblett, etc. --Hadal (talk) 20:31, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * , I think you are a much nicer person than me. Drmies (talk) 20:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I take full responsibility for my generosity! I'll try to keep an eye on the user post-block expiry. But I won't object to anyone modifying the duration. --Hadal (talk) 20:38, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I had removed my edit when you banned me wouldn't call that generous Chiraq3456 (talk) 14:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * what Chiraq3456 (talk) 20:33, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I was trying to add an actual serial killer to the list and I kind of messed up I was gonna remove it anyway so please unban me Chiraq3456 (talk) 11:51, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I tried to add Dayvon Daquan Bennet to the list of serial killers it is public information that police named him as the killer of 3 people he also hinted himself that he has killed over five people Chiraq3456 (talk) 18:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * These events also happened over a period of time meaning he fits the definition of a serial killer Chiraq3456 (talk) 18:32, 10 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I don't think you fully grasp what it means to back up your edits/claims with verifiable sources. Whether you believe him to be a serial killer, or for that matter how many people he may have killed, is immaterial. You must provide sources for such claims. (Not just who he killed, but whether A VERIFIABLE SOURCE has described him as a serial killer.) Do you understand what I'm saying? Your block will expire in a few days regardless; but you'll have to hold yourself to a higher standard if you wish to contribute to the site. Please take some more time to read over Wikipedia's editing policies. --Hadal (talk) 18:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * well I was actually trying to add newspaper sources however I am new to editing and was struggling with this.Chiraq3456 (talk) 19:17, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * so this was essentially a basic mistake on my part so I would appreciate it if I were to be unbanned but if not fair enough Chiraq3456 (talk) 19:24, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely
Let's try this again: Per your edit to Paddy Pimblett, it is clear that you have not taken the time to review our policies, and that you are determined to disrupt Wikipedia. You have been blocked indefinitely because you are not here to build an encyclopedia. Because I am blocking all edits from you, including your talk page, I will direct you to UTRS for any further inquiry. --Hadal (talk) 15:10, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Relaible sources are needed
" All content must be cited from reliable, independent sources with a reputation for fact checking." This does not include information you garnered from police reports. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:37, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

is closed. User needs to describe concisely and clearly how their edits merited a block, what they would do differently, and what constructive edits they would make. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)