User talk:Chizteen

June 2018
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Chris Griffin, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 05:25, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Eric Cartman, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Count Count (talk) 06:53, 2 June 2018 (UTC) Correction: Reason was valid --Count Count (talk) 07:06, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * "No source" is not good enough. Try finding a source or adding a citation needed template first instead of removing content. --Count Count (talk) 06:54, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * What if zero sources are found upon research? Chizteen (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Then add a citation needed template inline. If after a while nobody adds a citation you can remove the content in question. --Count Count (talk) 06:58, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Specify the duration of "a while". Chizteen (talk) 06:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * There is no clear-cut rule. As you can see the template is used in many places. I would suggest a month or so. In any case I just checked WP:UNSOURCED and according to that your removal was allowed. So I apologize and will of course not revert you another time if you remove the text again. --Count Count (talk) 07:04, 2 June 2018 (UTC)