User talk:Chloedx

Duke Cunningham
Please do not delete large section without explaining why you believe they should be removed, as you did in the Duke Cunningham article. Please note that someone has spent time to write the article (and never got paid for it), so out of common courtesy, please explain your reasoning as to why you believe the text should be removed. --Asbl 16:34, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Ken Calvert
It looks like you're engaging in the same unexplained revisions to the Ken Calvert article as it relates to Duke Cunningham and connections to Thomas Kontogiannis. It's not that you can't make revisions, but consider that the deletions you are making (so far) have been backed up with external citations, while your actions have absolutely no explanation. The things you delete don't say that Ken Calvert is a bad person (or guilty), rather, they report (and document) his known relationships to, and dealings with, other people. If you have a case to make for the veracity of the source, feel free to add that (and document from a reliable external source).

Wikipedia is not a soapbox for personal opinion. - Quartermaster 19:21, 6 July 2006 (UTC)