User talk:Chloepong

Speedy deletion nomination of Chroga


A tag has been placed on Chroga requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 15:11, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Your hangon rationale
There are two problems I noticed: You might also want to read about what Wikipedia is not, in particular the part about not being a free Web host. So the information you intended to see become part of the article should instead be added to your own website. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 15:59, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) You wrote, THis page directly refers to a group of real people who are considering starting a business. The problem here is that since the business itself does not meet our inclusion guidelines for businesses already, I do not see how its founders would meet our inclusion guidelines for people if starting such a business is the subject's main claim to fame.
 * 2) You also wrote, ...and are using this page as a information page about their business.'' One of the pillars of Wikipedia is that articles must be written from a neutral point of view, that is, from the point of view of someone at least one step detached from the subject of the article. Please read our conflict of interest guidelines.