User talk:Chn23

Welcome!
Hi Chn23! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! —Bagumba (talk) 23:23, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Tom Brady, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you.—Bagumba (talk) 23:30, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

I see it as half vandalism half incorrect edit as there was misguided intent that was addressed and still ignored such acts harm pages and are against Wikipedia certain segments which say to or not to remove and reasons why wrongful edits must be confronted and or brought up to light. Chn23 (talk) 10:19, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Tom Brady. A reminder also on what is not vandalism. —Bagumba (talk) 15:05, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Once a person doesn’t listen when all of there points are refuted and debunked over and over again then it’s no long good faith and proven so especially when it goes against the Wikipedia guidelines on what not to remove and edit !!!! Chn23 (talk) 11:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Talk:Tom Brady, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. ''Editors are asked to be bold in their edits. If you don't agree with others, feel free to establish consensus for your preferred content instead of labelling actions as "dirty and underhanded 1000%". Follow dispute resolution.'' —Bagumba (talk) 11:56, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

I haven’t been editing nor been disruptive, as for him editing without anyone agreeing with him or with no true backed up reasoning or great point that is why I disagree with and champion for the change to be reversed and every time I dissembled his arguments he either ignored or brushed off my views which is highly bad faith and non cooperative at all. Chn23 (talk) 07:42, 1 January 2023 (UTC)