User talk:ChocolateRabbit/Archive 2

2017 Pacific hurricane season
Although I know you mean well, it has been long-standing convention that the linked NHC advisories constitute sufficient verification of the information. When you revert anything on the grounds of lack of sourcing, you really should consider looking to see if the information added is actually verifiable. If possible, it is far more productive to address the sourcing issue yourself than to revert.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:58, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your clarification. Cheers --MJ500 Fancy a coffee? 03:00, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of 2017 Créteil mosque incident for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017 Créteil mosque incident is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2017 Créteil mosque incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Greenbörg  (talk)  08:26, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Farewell Baghdad (2010 film)
Please do not make a revert like this again using automated tools. It's clearly fixing the date format on the article.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 10:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)