User talk:Chocolatecaliente510

A tag has been placed on Chrystiaan grant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  En dl ess Dan  12:31, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Farrah franklin.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Farrah franklin.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 13:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Chrystiaan Grant
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chrystiaan Grant, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of the page. --Onorem♠Dil 13:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Please do not create hoaxes. Please do not attempt to put misinformation into Wikipedia to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with varying results. Most hoaxes are marked for deletion within a few hours after they are created. Some Wikipedians suspect that the majority of hoaxes here are attempts to test the system. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. - TexMurphy 13:39, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

I do not appreciate being accused of lying. That is the ultimate "no-no." Just because you don't think something is true, or just because it doesn't show up on Google or some shit does not mean it never happened. It's not on Google because idiots like Mathew Knowles wanted to keep the whole thing hushed up! DUH!!!! Use your brain sometimes!! That's why your stupid website isn't even valid at our school!!! They said we're NOT ALLOWED to use Wikipedia at all for research papers!!! SO AHA!!!! HUSH THAT FUSS, BITCHES!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chocolatecaliente510 (talk • contribs)


 * Verifiability, not truth. That is the policy. It doesn't matter if it's true or not. You have to be able to prove it with reliable sources. Please stop with the personal attacks. Continuing incivility may lead to a block. --Onorem♠Dil 13:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm not the one personally attacking anyone...y'all are the ones personally attacking me!!!! You delete everything I write!!! I've seen plenty of pages on this fucked up website without citations or any of that shit...it's because I'm black!!!!!! BITCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Fuck you, fuck your mama, fuck your whole family!!!! Chocolatecaliente510 14:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Onorem♠Dil 14:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC)