User talk:Choi.a/New sandbox

Hi Ashley! Overall, I was impressed by your contributions to this article. I think that you brought up valuable information, and inserted portions that tied existing informations together. Great job catching errors in the existing article, such as mis-cited articles and outdated information! You really seem to know a lot about Dry Needling. You did a great job using many citations, maintaining a neutral voice, and including a wide range of viewpoints. I would suggest that you add more hyperlinks to other pages that readers may be interested in. For example, you mentioned the American Physical Therapy Association, and I think you could definitely hyperlink that for any reader who wants to look into that group. Otherwise, I think you did a fantastic job, and you motivated me to look back on my article to see if I could edit any of the existing information on it. I also enjoyed reading about this topic--I didn't know this was a medical option that is being considered! Ellisonkim99 (talk) 00:31, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Sarah Peer Review
Hi Ashley,

I thought your edits really improved the quality of this article. The lines that you chose to delete did not contribute to the article message as a whole and introduced more confusion. I also liked how you analyzed the information even more from a physical therapist's perspective and added information from the APTA, which elevates the source quality. Under the section "Technique" there was additional information given about deep dry needling, but there was not any about superficial dry needling, which almost made it feel a little incomplete since I found myself looking for information on that but didn't find any in the writing. Other than that I think the edits were really great and helped me understand more about why the topic of dry needling is so debated and whether or not it should be included under the physical therapists' scope of practice.

Chang.sar (talk) 23:46, 28 February 2019 (UTC)