User talk:Choi1979

January 2014
Your recent editing history at Alexander Bogdanov shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. RolandR (talk) 17:31, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Removal of encyclopedia content with no explanation; potential vandalism
For the second time now I've noted, and reversed, this edit to Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, the second now from User:Choi1979. First was from an IP#. I'm not acting on the content of the edits but the fact that they are unexplained. I hope you will reconsider this form of editing as it can appear to be Vandalism. There is an "Edit summary" space below the edit area to give such an explanation for each edit. In addition, I'd recommend creating a user page (just click on the red name) but that's personal preference of mine. Thanks. Swliv (talk) 16:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC)