User talk:Cholmes75/Archive/Archive-Apr2007

photo
i have added all the required information and tags needed for

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Pacnkiss.jpg

-- Supreme euphanasia 20:15, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not assume ownership of articles such as kiss (band). If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others. -- Supreme euphanasia 20:29, 23 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Better be careful before leveling accusations like that. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 20:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

its all good in the hood :) -- Supreme euphanasia 20:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

hey seriously man u a kiss fan? or u just purposely do want the photo there if it bothers u that much ill take it out if ur a kiss fan just tell me why cause i think it goes with the article and is important -- Supreme euphanasia 21:52, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The photo itself is fine - but it is a copyrighted photo taken from another website, and that's a problem. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 22:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 13:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Oakland Raiders
im not adding nonsence to the raiders page. They won thri conference in 1982 and im adding that to the page —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Morales664 (talk • contribs) 00:52, 6 April 2007 (UTC).

Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Call of the West
Actually, there are many published discussions of the songs on this album which I could cite. Some are already linked in the article. All of my comments thus far have been neutral and dispassionate and factually accurate, and most of them reflect things which are more or less self-evident if you actually listen to the album. Hardly any of what's in the article constitutes "original research" per se. What little there was of that I just removed. I have kept the sections in this article fairly concise and nothing more is written than is absolutely necessary.

As for "personal attacks", you would do well to follow your own advice. I don't appreciate your snide, snarky, peremptory tone. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tantalizing Posey (talk • contribs) 03:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC).

Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:45, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Kiss Edit
There was not a space inbetween the words "in" and "Rolling". Perhaps you didnt see it but I see no need for that to be reverted and a message to be left on my userpage. GShton 20:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * If a minor change isn't obvious right away, I almost always revert. Had you used an edit summary, neither the reversion nor the note would've been needed.  People shouldn't have to search for what changes are made to an article.  --cholmes75 (chit chat) 20:40, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * They shouldn't just assume it is vandalism either. GShton 20:41, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Who mentioned vandalism? Not I.  --cholmes75 (chit chat) 21:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * So you reverted it for no reason at all? GShton 23:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC)