User talk:Cholmes75/Archive/Archive-Aug2007

Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:03, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

TeamXbox
Hello, just wanted to let you know that I just requested page protection for TeamXbox as you have been reverting the vandalism there. Thanks for reverting vandalism there!Cheers,  Neranei   T / C  21:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and protected it. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 21:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Lizardsfromafar
Hi, you blocked this user today for recreating a band page, he is requesting unblock, you might want to review it if you're around :) Thanks! -- lucasbfr talk 16:45, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I also want to comment on this. I gave this user a final warning after you deleted it. The warning was not immediately after (maybe about 10 minutes after deletion), so I'd like to make sure the block is fair and that the user wasn't blocked for a non-existant fifth creation. (Unless they used a different article name that I did not see.) -WarthogDemon 18:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads up, I have commented on the user's talk page. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 19:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

5th Avenue
Why did you revert my edits? It's a fact that they taste better than Butterfinger
 * Ummm, sure. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 03:35, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Concerning the Jena article, if you would have read the talk page you would have seen I did discuss it there and that I did have a valid reason... Jstanierm 13:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Magfa Content
Dear Cholmes I'm Vahid Ghafarpour, Technical Manager of Magfa Communication systems SBU. I try to create the wiki page of our company base on our contents. I'm one of creators of these content and can have copyright of these data. (all of them are historical or introducing data) As you know this information are copied from our website but I have privilege to do so and publish these data base of GFDL. would you please leave them on wikipedia or help me to create acceptable contents. regards, وحيد 18:35, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

so if I change that copyright sign to GFDL license you leave my content?

Jena High School
Quit messaging me. Thanks. Jstanierm 19:10, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Your deletion of HomerNotes as nonsense is ill advised....
That is a legitimate term and can be backed up easily. Please consider reposting the page.
 * I have considered it, and won't be reposting anything. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 21:20, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Matthew roloff mugshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Matthew roloff mugshot.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. - auburn pilot   talk  20:30, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Eat_Em_And_Smile_Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Eat_Em_And_Smile_Cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex  21:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Time out album cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Time out album cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I've removed your addition of "allmusic.com" because it is neither specific nor completely accurate. If we get an image from a website, the URL of the image itself should be given, along with the webpage incorporating it. Furthermore, the image size and width/height ration are different, so it cannot be the same image. Since you are the uploader, you presumably know how the image was resized and/or otherwise processed. I recommend you include a brief statement of what was done (e.g., "resized with Photoshop by me") to assure folks that you aren't just slapping a convenient source on a disputed image because an annoying bot is complaining about licensing. &#9786; I've added a complete but speculated source to the image talk page as an example; feel free to tweak it with the correct information and add it to the "source" line. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 15:15, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Gameface deleted
Hi, can you please tell me why the article Gameface was deleted?
 * Because the article failed to assert the notability of the band per the guidelines of WP:MUSIC. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 13:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

A disinformation vandal ip to watch for
Cholmes as I note you reverted this edit of a vandal (then on this ip) who has been adding a variety of disinformation to articles. Can I wise-you-up that you are one those likely to see them first, as they seem to choose Kiss albums and pages fairly early on their jollies. There is further information about this on my talk page in the sections headed "Hello Alf" and "The false info vandal". Many thanks for your watchfullness in this respect.--Alf melmac 12:33, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I will keep an eye out - thanks. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 13:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Recent deletion- Scojo Foundaiton
Dear Cholmes, I am an intern at Scojo Foundation and recently created a page about our work. Since I am an employee of the foundation, I have authority to use content on the website and my actions do not violate copyright. Under these circumstances, would it be possible to leave my page up? Please message me if you have any more concerns/ questions about my created page. Thank you.
 * If you are an employee you should not be creating an article about your company since that will likely be seen as WP:SPAM. In any case, in order to use content from your website see the procedures on WP:CP.  --cholmes75 (chit chat) 14:38, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Follow-up from previous discussion with Admin Wiki alf
Cholmes75 take note... the "falsifier" talked about earlier by Wiki alf and myself is back as. He's been very bust and will require a toolbox rollback. Thanks. 156.34.217.110 22:20, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 23:43, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Oakland Raiders 1st logo.GIF)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Oakland Raiders 1st logo.GIF. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Louis  Alberto   Guel  23:51, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:AmericanFootballLeague.png
You removed the image from the article History of American football with the note that there was no fair use rationale. However, it should be noted that this is 100% wrong. The image page in question had a SPECIFIC fair use rational for the article in question; in fact it was (and still is) the only article using said image that has a specific fair use rationale. There was a typo in the Fair Use Rationale which I just corrected; this MAY have thown off AWB, but you really should read the image pages before removing the images from articles. This dif: shows that the Fair Use Rationale has been in place since June 27, 2007; the same day it was added to the article in question. --Jayron32| talk | contribs 02:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Delmore Atom
Cholmes75,

I tried to create an Article on an influential musical artist in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania area. Please help me understand the changes I need to make to the content/structure to get the artical accepted/posted.

I don't understand what is going on here or how this process works. Please forgive me and help me make this suitable for posting.

Please advise.

Ruffhaus 16:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Regine Velasquez Article
What are you trying to do? The article has already been peer reviewed? Do you have anything personal against it?

Please look at the Kiss Article you have been actively editing and tell me why I can't add graphics in the Regine Velasquez Page.
 * Where is the peer review located? I'd like to take a look at it?  --cholmes75 (chit chat) 19:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

In response to your message
In response to your message:

1. The name of the event. - You don't need an image for this. 2. The person/people involved in the event. - You don't need an image for this. 3. The date and venue of the said event. - You don't need an image for this.

--> If you can provide a good source for all this information, a proper substitute, then let me know. Otherwise, DON'T GO ABOUT DELETING PICS ON SOMEONE ELSE'S ARTICLE. I spent a lot of time on this article and I don't appreciate what you are doing.

The picture also shows you how the performer has changed over the years.'' - Where in the article does it discuss this? Any other questions let me know. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 18:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

--> You can VISUALLY do this by looking at the pictures, one poster is from the 1980's another is from a concert in 2004. The fashionista section discusses her image change.

What I'm trying to say is a picture is worth a thousand words. By adding one graphic, you can add so much interesting information in your article. The graphic I chose were valid by wikipedia standards and they are not only there for cosmetic purpose as you claimed when you disputed the image's fair use rationale.

The article has already passed a review.

Maoster 19:06, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:32, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

huntaway page
YOU DIDN'T RESPOND!!!!!!!!!! i am still very unhappy i was going to put a pic on it how would you like it if someone deleted your page.91.109.71.37 cholmes (chit chat)
 * I didn't respond because you didn't ask a question. But to answer this one, I have had articles and images deleted and it's no big deal.  --cholmes75 (chit chat) 13:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Smile!


WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Just spreading some random wikilove. :) -WarthogDemon 04:14, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:KISS Shout It Out Loud.ogg
Thank you for uploading Image:KISS Shout It Out Loud.ogg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:15, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Regine Velasquez
Took less than 10 hours. Guess you were right. The Evil Spartan 16:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi Cholmes75, regarding the edit of the Riki Kiru piece: I added an entry to the article which, if it had been read, clearly states why the article was wrong. Can I therefore request that the 1500lbs squat which never took place is removed and that a witness being given as Paul Anderson is impossible. The article states that he was present in 2005 when a quick search will show that he passed away - died - in 1994. Therefore the article is false and should be amended. As I also stated there have been many, many claims made on Riki's behalf many of which are untrue. I'd happily withdraw my request regarding the 1500lbs squat if it can be shown - video or photo will do - that he squatted it to a depth as required by all powerlifting federations.

Steve

image:samael triangles
thanks for your edit to the image i uploaded and the removal of the deletion tag i put on there, and also my comment on your edit is that it is a valid reason for deletion when i am the one who uploaded the image & who maintains the page that the image is located on, peace:)  Ancientanubis ,  talk  Editor Review 23:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Venture bros logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Venture bros logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 06:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Venture bros logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Venture bros logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 06:32, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Kiss singles
There actually are templates like that used for other bands, examples being Aerosmith and The Beatles. FMAFan1990 22:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I actually think that sorting the singles by album would be best, though I think some help could be done with the formatting. FMAFan1990 23:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)


 * OK I get what you're saying. FMAFan1990 23:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 13th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:01, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

IFD
Hi and thanks for helping out at IFD. Just to let you know, when you delete images where it's close to a no consensus (e.g., some of the files from Images and media for deletion/2007 August 6, where it's just the nominator and one person saying "keep") but your judgment tells you that the image doesn't make it under policy, people get mad and you end up in DRV. So my advice to you is to add your "delete" !vote and rationale and let someone else do the deletion. I'm speaking from personal experience here having had a few overturned with the explanation "Deleting admin cannot substitute his own judgment for the consensus". Regards,  howcheng  {chat} 18:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Glad to help out - thanks for the advice! --cholmes75 (chit chat) 19:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 20th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC)