User talk:Chong Regan/sandbox

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Chong Regan (talk) 13:22, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

I have no intention to advertise or promote the Hong Konger Front website. Thank you for raising the concerns that the contents of the article violate the rules of Wikipedia. I am new, and I am still in the processing of learing how to comply with writing rules of Wikipedia. I have already removed the disputable parts of the article. Please check and read whether the remaining part conmply with Wikipedia's writing rule or not. If there is still any disputable content, please let me know and I shall try my level best to improve it to your satisfaction. Hong Kong's democracy and civil liberty is increasingly undermined by the Chinese government over the past few years. Considering the freedom of exspression in Hong Kong is at risk. Over the past two years, in Hong Kong, dozens of political activists were sent to jail. The pro-dependence National Party was banned. Two democratic university professors were sent to jail for organizing the "Occupy Central" protest. The Hong Konger Front Website is the last-line measures to fight for Hong Kong people's freedom. So, I don't think you will question why an article cannot be written about this site. I understand you question the way this article was written and presented; hence, I am still in the processing of learing how to comply with writing rules of Wikipedia. Reproduced below is an encouraging reply to me from one of your colleagues last month.

[Ticket#2019053110004901]

Dear Regan Chong,

I can't think of any reason why an article about this group could not be created as long as it meets our notability standards which seems quite likely.

Unfortunately for you, though, we prefer that articles be written by people not connected to the organization to avoid conflict of interest problems.

I'll include some standard wording below which identifies a place where you can request that an article be written:

Thank you for contacting Wikipedia with your request that we host an article about your organization on our website. We appreciate your interest in Wikipedia, but we don't actually take direct "requests" for the creation of articles via email and we discourage people from writing or editing articles about themselves, their companies, their clients, or their products and services (for more about why, please see  and ). However, you may suggest your article topic to Wikipedia editors by adding it to one of the lists at . Please note that you should add the title (in this case, your name) to the specific subject area listing where it best fits.

Some warnings about the Requested Articles process: 1.) the entries there are not ordered by time but by subject area, and a new entry there will have just as good a chance of being picked and written about as a very, very old one, which means it is not on a first come/ first served basis, 2.) our list of requested articles contains tens of thousands of entries, many of which may never be written because our article topics are chosen by our readers based on their own interests, and 3.) adding your name to this list is no guarantee that anyone will necessarily ever attempt to create the article on you. However, it is one way you can at least put the idea out there for others to consider.

And if you are willing to write the article yourself, disclose your own conflict-of-interest, and submit it for other editors to review, you can use our Article Wizard  to write it and then submit it to our Articles for Creation process  where it can be considered for publication— the backlog there is sometimes over 5 weeks long or greater, but is more likely to result in the actual publication of the article than placing your name on our Requested Articles list.

I hope this has been helpful. Again, thank you for your interest.