User talk:Chooonz

EDL
Please do not mark my edits as vandalism when it clearly isn't. Mo ainm  ~Talk  13:17, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Two words. Reliable sources. My reliable sources say that you are a vandal. Ergo you are.Chooonz (talk) 13:25, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * That's intelligent of you did you think that up all by yourself? Suppose wouldn't expect anything else from you judging by your edits. Mo ainm  ~Talk  13:32, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Calm down son, you'll give yourself a heart attack. Your blood is boiling, and I am smiling.94.196.1.236 (talk) 13:34, 20 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Do not characterize good faith edits as vandalism as you did here. You need instead engage in article talk towards resolving the dispute. --John (talk) 15:09, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * A good faith edit is not one which is intended to mislead the reader. Therefore it was vandalism. Please do not support vandalism by excusing those who engage in it.Chooonz (talk) 15:12, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunate response. I have blocked you for 24 hours to allow you to read the link I gave you to our policy on vandalism. On your return (if you plan to return) please do not make this mistake again. --John (talk) 15:17, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I laughed, as you qq'd. From the article, "Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia." Which rather proves my point, I think you'll find.Chooonz (talk) 15:34, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * During your enforced break you might want to read WP:RS and WP:BRD. Carry on as you did today and you will end up with a escalating series of blocks.  IN particular note that if you make a contested change then you don't edit war, you discuss your changes on the talk page.  -- Snowded  TALK  15:45, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * You guys do realise that you aren't going to stop people enforcing honesty over your sad little corner of the internet, right? Whilst you are pulling your hair out that honest folks like me exist, we're in your Wikipedia, correcting your dishonest edits. It kills you, I know that, but it's time for the lies to stop, guise.Chooonz (talk) 15:51, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on English Defence League. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mo ainm  ~Talk  13:19, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.