User talk:ChopinDeezNutz

September 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:30, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft was changed by ChopinDeezNutz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.974537 on 2016-09-30T18:30:20+00:00.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please type    before your message. 18:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please type    before your message. 18:50, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please type    before your message. 18:52, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. Widr (talk) 18:54, 30 September 2016 (UTC)