User talk:Chopnotslop

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Og ron c has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.myspace.com/ogronc (matching the regex rule \bmyspace\.com). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:07, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.myspace.com/ogronc (matching the regex rule \bmyspace\.com). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Og ron c
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Og ron c, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Og ron c appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Og ron c has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Woogee (talk) 05:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Og ron c
A tag has been placed on Og ron c requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  ttonyb (talk) 05:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Og ron c, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  ttonyb (talk) 05:30, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Nobody is doubting the existence of this person, nor their website. What we are concerned about is their notability.  Please see WP:BAND, as well as WP:COI.  Woogee (talk) 05:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

OG RON C deletion
OK So If I trim it down a bit and speak just of the things he as done as a CEO for Swishahouse and the albums and mixtapes he as done as a dj will you let it stay?!?

chopnotslop (talk) 12:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Posting your own copyrighted material
Please see CP. Woogee (talk) 05:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

The link you provided on my Talk page only shows that he exists. Are there articles which talk about him with enough detail to write a biography from? Woogee (talk) 05:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

You can't just make the claims of notability, you need to prove it with reliable sources. Woogee (talk) 06:02, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Is MTV not a reliable enough source? Chopnotslop (talk) 12:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

The paparoach link looks okay, but the creative firm doesn't look like it's independent. Be also sure to see WP:BLP. All claims must be sourced to reliable sources. Woogee (talk) 06:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Og ron c. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you.  ttonyb (talk) 07:08, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Copyright Issues and Notability

 * There are a couple of issues, first, Wikipedia discourages create of articles by individuals closely associated with the subject of the article. WP:CONFLICT can give you more information about the reasoning behind this.  Secondly, the reason the article was deleted and is currently nominated is it is a copy of existing text.  This is a violation of Wikipedia guideline and U.S. copyright laws.  The way to resolve this is to rewrite the existing text; permit it use under a license compatible with Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA); or donate the copyrighted material to Wikipedia; .  Please note that donating the copyrighted material does have some issues associated with the action.


 * Getting beyond those two issues, the way to have an article accepted into Wikipedia is to make sure it meets the criteria for inclusion. Specifically, it need to establish notability for the subject of the article.  This notability is not based on "real-world" notability, but rather on Wikipedia based criteria.  Please take a look at the sections above and I will also make sure you have a Welcome message on your talk page that has a number of great links to help create a page.  If you have any specific questions after you read the sections, please let me know.  My best to you...  ttonyb  (talk) 07:10, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
 ttonyb (talk) 07:19, 23 February 2010 (UTC)