User talk:Chopperhead2011

Spam in Brabus TKR
is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

August 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ford Motor Company, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kerotan Talk  Have  a nice day :) 06:45, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

June 2022
Hello, I'm MrOllie. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 02:37, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Genocide. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * What you are doing there is not helpful. Your personal opinion on what "genocide" means is just not relevant: what matters is what reliable secondary sources say, and that section you removed had plenty of strong sourcing. Drmies (talk) 02:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The section I removed had no strong sourcing whatsoever. The first two citations (93 and 94) are merely declarations of the desire to have transgender people included under the umbrella of genocide. The thesis done in the third citation was written under the framework of international law by a quite well known biomedical engineer, which is hardly relevant to the topic. The next three sources completely ignore possible extraneous factors, such as the increase in frequency with which people are coming out as trans, the proven psychotropic consequences of romanticizing being noncishet, the exponential advancement of technology which allows for better recording of these trends (implying that there is only an illusion of an increase in violence against trans people and the rate has possibly not changed at all), etc. Using the same logic in the contested section, the next citation (100) implies that cis men are also currently victims of genocide, which is demonstrably false. Citation 101 is functionally the same as 93 & 94. The next citation is about the fact that transgender people do, in fact, get killed, which is not genocide; people from every group are killed every year. I could go on.
 * Not to mention that the page doesn't once mention the genocide of whites (which is ACTUALLY happening in South Africa) or the 100,000,000 victims of politicide.
 * So, your personal opinion on what "genocide" means is just not relevant; what matters is what secondary reliable sources say, and the section that I removed had none. Chopperhead2011 (talk) 03:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I started to type up a lengthy response to each of your points, as you're almost entirely wrong (except about the Master's thesis cited, which probably wouldn't stand on it's own but in this case is fine since it's just supplementing a peer-reviewed journal article), but then you say this: Not to mention that the page doesn't once mention the genocide of whites (which is ACTUALLY happening in South Africa). This is not true (see White genocide (conspiracy theory) and South African farm attacks) and undercuts the idea that you're not just motivated by a misguided personal opinion. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)Talk to Me! 07:23, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Of course you brought up the conspiracy. Notice that "the fact that whites are being systematically murdered in South Africa" and "the global white population is being eradicated through race mixing" aren't the same fucking thing. As a matter of fact, just the murders of farm owners is occurring at higher rates than the murders of trans people in the US, despite South Africa literally having 15% of the population. But you'd know that if you actually looked at the second fucking article you sent. It's almost like you're a braindead ideologue who has never had an original thought in your life. But that's par for the course these days.
 * And you conveniently stopped before addressing the millions of politicide victims of communist regimes in the 20th century. I couldn't imagine why... Chopperhead2011 (talk) 07:35, 23 June 2022 (UTC)


 * There is no "white genocide". There is no "white genocide" in South Africa either. The genocide in Cambodia is explained in the article, so "victims of communist regimes" are in there as well. Now, I'm not going to block you for fucking fucking fucking, but next time you insult someone like you did here ("braindead ideologue") I will block you. And if you keep repeating myths that argue that somehow whites are being exterminated, and if you keep removing well-sourced material (don't know what you mean with "merely declarations of the desire to have transgender people included"--the two articles were published in peer-reviewed academic journals, and that's what counts) because you don't like it, I will block you indefinitely. If you actually want to improve the article, you can discuss the matter on the talk page. Drmies (talk) 14:30, 6 July 2022 (UTC)