User talk:Choppy00

July 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of the most subscribed channels on YouTube has been reverted. Your edit here to List of the most subscribed channels on YouTube was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqJvwo4841qb7d7VU3Wa2qA) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:34, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Roxy the dog. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Fletch, Vaughan & Megan because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Roxy the dog (resonate) 07:21, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Fletch, Vaughan & Megan, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.- gadfium 09:27, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fletch, Vaughan & Megan, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Fletch, Vaughan & Megan was changed by Choppy00 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882382 on 2014-07-12T09:38:36+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:38, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with these edits on Once Upon a Time (TV series) and Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.. -- Ditto51 ( My Talk Page ) 12:22, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Fletch, Vaughan & Megan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Also, even if you weren't edit warring, I would advise against adding this material again. Wikipedia has some rules, many of which were linked above, but because you don't appear to have checked them, I'll summarize some important ones for you:


 * Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
 * "Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
 * We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
 * Wikipedia is not a general discussion forum, additions to talk pages should be about improving the article within the guidelines, not voicing one's opinion on the subject matter.
 * Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards.  User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided.  Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
 * Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources.  Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.
 * Ian.thomson (talk) 16:34, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Fletch, Vaughan & Megan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Fletch, Vaughan & Megan was changed by Choppy00 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880699 on 2014-07-18T13:34:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:34, 18 July 2014 (UTC)