User talk:Chopra Aditya

April 2011
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Yash Raj Films into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moocha (talk) 14:30, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Additionally, if you want to simply create an "alias" for a page - that's called a redirect, and you can learn more about how to create and use them on the Redirect page. Moocha (talk) 14:32, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Kapoor Family


A tag has been placed on The Kapoor Family, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is a copy of several existing Wikipedia articles cut-and-pasted together, and adds nothing to Kapoor family

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. bonadea contributions talk 07:12, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Creating copies of existing pages
Please don't create copies of pages that already exist in Wikipedia. It is possible to create redirects to existing articles, if you want a different title to point to the same content, and I have redirected Kapoor Family to Kapoor family. Please don't recreate the copy-and-paste article again. Thank you! --bonadea contributions talk 07:15, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kapoor Family. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 07:23, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kapoor Family, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash; Abhishek Talk to me 07:30, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bhayani family


A tag has been placed on Bhayani family requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. X X X antiuser eh? 07:33, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bhayani family, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 12:22, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bhayani family, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 17:28, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
This is your last warning; the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Bhayani family, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. bonadea contributions talk 10:45, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bhayani family, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''

Hi Chopra Aditya, you're getting a second "final warning" because I believe you are editing in good faith - but please do not keep making the same unconstructive edits. If the warnings and notices on this page are hard to understand, please ask - there are many people around who would he bappy to help you out, but if you don't stop editing in this way, you may be blocked. Thank you,  bonadea'' contributions talk 14:12, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent unconstructive editing, despite numerous warnings. This includes repeatedly removing maintenance templates, which you have been warned about repeatedly over a period of nearly three weeks. In addition, when the block expires please do not continue to create articles about subjects which are not notable. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information on anything, and is not a social network site. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:00, 5 May 2011 (UTC)