User talk:Chopradxb

Your submission at Articles for creation: Al Rostamani Group (January 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Al Rostamani Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Al_Rostamani_Group Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MarcGarver&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Al_Rostamani_Group reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarcGarver (talk) 12:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Mark,
 * I am trying to create a page of facts regarding the Al Rostamani group as there does not exist one right now. Also for some reason when i look to resubmit it says my account is flagged. can you please let me know if that is case. I can rewrite the article just with facts about the organization. Chopradxb (talk) 13:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Al Rostamani Group


A tag has been placed on Draft:Al Rostamani Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 13:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Reply
Thanks for email. It is not correct that you cannot edit this talk page

It is pretty clear that you are editing on behalf of the company and have an obvious conflict of interest. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Chopradxb. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . You did not do that, so I blocked you.

Also read the following regarding writing an article:
 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * Most of your text was unreferenced or referenced only to the company or press releases


 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.
 * You don't say whether the company has any staff, turnover, or profits


 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
 * Much of what you wrote was just promo eg a leading conglomerate... known for its long-term business partnerships, customer-focused strategies, and vast distribution network... quickly became the market leader in providing comprehensive travel... . It has been a leader in foreign exchange services in the UAE for over four decades... a testament to the company's vision for the city...  and so on.


 * There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * I didn't check, but a text dump with no wikilinks and few refs looks suspicious

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article.

You said and build a repository of content for companies to take notice of my services. That sounds as if you are planning to offer your services to companies for a fee.

You can request an unblock here by completing and saving the text at the bottom of the page. You will not be permitted to edit Al Rostamani Group, or anything connetced to it,so you will need to say what else you will want to write about instead. A different admin will consider your request Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:58, 28 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Chopradxb (talk) 05:27, 29 March 2023 (UTC)