User talk:Chowbok/Threats

May 2010
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:K5okc. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Your bad faith posts about me and the personal attacks you make in them are growing very tiresome. Desist in wikistalking me and adding your snarky insults about me. You've worn out your welcome regarding this sort of behavior and it absolutely needs to stop. Does your mouth water when you stalk my edits and you are able to attack me again? Do you think you score a coupe when you revert something you think I did? Not cool, Chowbok, and I'm frankly sick and tired of your showing up to post personal attacks on talk pages. You are the one who aligned himself with a now banned user and started a war. This sort of behavior is unacceptable. Oh, and just to clarify, your comment here is incorrect. A fair-use image that has a rationale for use on a page is entirely acceptable. The problem was that the editor who posted didn't have a rationale. Learn the rules. Wildhartlivie (talk) 00:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Even your post about images couldn't resist a personal attack, back off Chowbok. I did not say that a fair-use image was acceptable when there was a free use image available. I simply said that they can be used with proper rationale. Obviously there is no need for fair-use if free are available. Regarding your edit to Al Pacino, there is no free use image available, so if the fair-use had proper rationale, it could be used. And since you can't resist posting snarky attacks on my page, stop posting to me unless you can control your snide remarks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 03:04, 22 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Unacceptable use
 * WP:NFC Jack Merridew 03:24, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Talk:Scarlett Johansson. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''This is a purposeful and clear person attack. Remove it please or it will go to AN/I. You've been warned about this sort of characterization before.'' Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:09, 9 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Can you take care to dial back this dispute with Wildhartlivie? I've spoken to both WHL and Jack Merridew to try to calm this, and it'd be good if you could also ensure that nothing is said or done to inflame things further. Thanks. Fences  &amp;  Windows  00:43, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Sani0346
Only Allah is powerful. We are the army of Allah. You'll see a huge threat in upcoming days beyond your imagination. As you are trying to damage Islam as a weapon under Zionists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sani0346 (talk • contribs) 17:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Warning : Do not fool us by your thoughts of deception. If somebody slaps you then what'll you do ? And now your damaging the religion of Muslims and creating a war in between nations. Go & impose your lies and deception on someone else ! If you one person has the right to add remarks & edit whatever you want then 1600000000 Muslims have their rights as well.

Warning : Do not edit & play with the believes of Muslims on internet. They knew best what are their believes. You have no right to add your remarks and manipulate the Wikipedia &mdash; Sani0346     —Preceding

Warning. What is your problem dude ? What do you need from me ? You are saying, I should not have removed the images of Prophet Muhammad from Wikipedia ? Are you in your sense ? You are creating fire in between millions of people. Do not show off. Do not give impression that your are student of Zionists ! Don't put your leg in breaking peace of the world. Otherwise this leg will be broken &mdash; Sani0346      —Preceding undated comment added 10:58, 13 September 2010 (UTC).

talk:Muhammed
Refactoring other people's talk page edits is against policy. If you persist in this, I will be forced to ask an administrator to intervene. thanks for your understanding. -- Ludwigs 2 23:36, 22 March 2011 (UTC)


 * there is an ANI thread which involves you at Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents. -- Ludwigs 2  23:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
This is your last warning; the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Wikipedia:WQA, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ''You've been warned about this before. You will be blocked if you go wrong again on this.'' Jasper Deng (talk) 00:36, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Quote (Please reply on your own talk page, not mine):

June 2010
Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Talk:Scarlett Johansson. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''This is a purposeful and clear person attack. Remove it please or it will go to AN/I. You've been warned about this sort of characterization before.'' Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:09, 9 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Can you take care to dial back this dispute with Wildhartlivie? I've spoken to both WHL and Jack Merridew to try to calm this, and it'd be good if you could also ensure that nothing is said or done to inflame things further. Thanks. Fences  &amp;  Windows  00:43, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

(End quote)
Jasper Deng (talk) 01:03, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, c'mon. That's your excuse for jumping right to the "final" warning level? That was over a year ago, from an editor who was in disputes with half of Wikipedia. Sheesh. Isn't there a statute of limitations or something? I've been here for over seven years, I imagine you could get backup for just about any accusation you care to make if you dig far back enough in my archives.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  01:15, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * You've had a history of this. Just refrain from incivility and you won't be bothered by this again.Jasper Deng (talk) 01:16, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I think templating regulars and initiating a conversation with a threat is pretty uncivil, actually.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  01:20, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but your behavior on WQA was not civil, and, I don't think you actually get this policy, given that you have done this several times on the long term. I followed the patterns of other users when they warned you about incivility. In the end, just stop. There's no disputing that. There's an exemption in WP:CIVILITY for policy violations too.Jasper Deng (talk) 01:25, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Asma al-Assad
I'm certain it will come as no surprise to you that I'm reporting you for any number of un-Wikipedian behaviors. Considering your pop-up of "Notice: If you are here to threaten me, please note that all threats should now be filed on the threats subpage. Thanks!", it's clear this isn't your first rodeo. Apparently you enjoy being disruptive - whatever. Flatterworld (talk) 23:43, 26 March 2011 (UTC)