User talk:Chris473

If your editing is backed by a smidgen of good faith, which I doubt, than you should be aware that Wikipedia does not accept copyrighted text copied from other source, like the homepage of Moore's stable. That's why it says "Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted" right underneath the editing box you enter your edits in. Repeatedly adding such content is considered vandalism. As is inserting rude comments about the editor who deleted the copyright violations. Original research and subjective commentary aren't allowed, either. Any repetition of your recent editing practices is likely to lead to loss of editing privileges (WP:BLOCK). Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:16, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • 03:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC) 03:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Cirt (talk) 14:07, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

January 2010
You have been blocked for disruption of Wikipedia, because you added material that could be regarded as defamatory. See Blocking policy: Biographies of living people. You may return when the block expires. Any further attempt to restore the material will incur another block. (see also user:66.57.96.198)   Will Beback    talk    21:48, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:07, 25 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Please review the WP:BLP policies before making further controversial edits about Jim Inhofe. I am all in favor of ensuring that Inhofe is portrayed accurately, but citing an opinion piece from a random blogger as evidence that Inhofe isn't really a Presbyterian, as he says he is, is just not the way to go about it. Thank you.--Arxiloxos (talk) 21:47, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

"Natasha Waller Cornett" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Natasha Waller Cornett. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they) &#124; o toki tawa mi. 04:26, 5 July 2021 (UTC)