User talk:ChrisBraithwaite

Article Mished.co.uk
I've added the "prod" template to the article Mished.co.uk, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Mished.co.uk. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~Matticus TC 12:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Reclaim Bank Charges
A tag has been placed on Reclaim Bank Charges, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

copyvio from http://www.unlawful-bank-charges.co.uk/ and how-to guide anyway

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 16:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)