User talk:ChrisGualtieri/Archive 22

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:12, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Little Hero of Holland
The article The Little Hero of Holland you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Little Hero of Holland for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement



 * Hello ChrisGualtieri:


 * This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 21 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 00:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thelma (1910 film)
The article Thelma (1910 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Thelma (1910 film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 11:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement



 * Hello ChrisGualtieri:


 * This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 22 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 05:12, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 May newsletter
The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on Corona Borealis and Microscopium - both of which received the maximum bonus. Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.
 * was one of several users who worked on improving Ulysses S. Grant. Remember, you do not need to work on an article on your own - as long as each person has completed significant work on the article during 2015, multiple competitors can claim the same article.
 * took Dragonfly to Good Article for a 3x bonus - and if that wasn't enough, they also took Damselfly there as well for a 2x bonus.
 * worked up Alexander Hamilton to Good Article for the maximum bonus. Hamilton was one of the founding fathers of the United States and is a level 4 vital article.

The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round! , and  16:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 11
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 11, March-April 2015

by, , ,

 Read the full newsletter
 * New donations - MIT Press Journals, Sage Stats, Hein Online and more
 * New TWL coordinators, conference news, and new reference projects
 * Spotlight: Two metadata librarians talk about how library professionals can work with Wikipedia

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Did not receive an email
Hi,

Regarding this edit, I did not receive an email yet. Can you please confirm that you sent it to me via "email this user" feature in English Wikipedia?

Thanks! huji— TALK 13:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * - Sent it to the e-mail you linked and provided for the Fa Wiki account. Not your English Wikipedia account. It was the email and link you provided. I can resend if you have not received it yet. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 03:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * They both go to the same email but somehow I didn't receive it. Would you mind resending via Special:EmailUser/Huji please? huji— TALK 23:43, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Persondata RfC
Hi, You participated in the previous Persondata RfC. I just wanted to notify you that a new RfC regarding the methodical removal of Persondata is taking place at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Thanks, —Msmarmalade (talk) 07:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement



 * Hello ChrisGualtieri:


 * This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 23 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 09:12, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#Proposal to merge WP:HENTAI into this project as a taskforce
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 06:32, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement



 * Hello ChrisGualtieri:


 * This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 24 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 09:18, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Questia
I've just renewed my Questia account. Thanks for your commitment in the project. --Demostene119 (talk) 18:50, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Did not receive an email
Hi,

Regarding this edit, I did not receive an email yet. Can you please confirm that you sent it to me via "email this user" feature in English Wikipedia?

Thanks! huji— TALK 13:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * - Sent it to the e-mail you linked and provided for the Fa Wiki account. Not your English Wikipedia account. It was the email and link you provided. I can resend if you have not received it yet. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 03:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * They both go to the same email but somehow I didn't receive it. Would you mind resending via Special:EmailUser/Huji please? huji— TALK 23:43, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi Again. Since I didn't get any email yet and this discussion was actually archived, I restored it to ask if you have taken action on this. Please let me know here or on my talk page when you get a chance to resend the key. Many thanks and apologies if I am following up too aggressively. :) huji— TALK 21:50, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay - I've sent it out twice since and I thought it was resolved. I have also been away for some time. Did you get it now? Did you check the spam folder? I am not sure as to why you would not have received it. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:48, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * No I didn't. I just checked my spam and trash folders again. It is really confusing because I have received other emails from users since, just not yours. To make matters easier, I am going to email you using the "Email this user" link on your user page. That way you have my email (and you can verify it is me because the email will tell you the user who sent it). Then you can simply reply to that. Would that work for you? huji— TALK 15:24, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Did you get my email? huji— TALK 17:19, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:29, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

1920s films
Seeing this, we only have 6 films at GA on 1920s compared to 47 for 1910s. Perhaps you could promote more 1920s and pre 1910 ones?♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Any chance you could get The Story of the Kelly Gang up to GA?♦ Dr. Blofeld  19:30, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Possibly... the 1910s is largely all me however. So that's not saying much! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:24, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Flag of His Country
The article The Flag of His Country you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Flag of His Country for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 14:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

TAFI week 22, 2015 update
Please note that Personality is also an article for improvement for week 22, 2015. Thank you. Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 01:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote



 * Hello ChrisGualtieri:


 * This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 25 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 06:44, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Avenged (1910 film)
The article Avenged (1910 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Avenged (1910 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Good888 -- Good888 (talk) 08:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Lucky Shot
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Lucky Shot you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 13:02, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Converted Deacon
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Converted Deacon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Lucky Shot
The article The Lucky Shot you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Lucky Shot for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Girls of the Ghetto
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Girls of the Ghetto you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:21, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Converted Deacon
The article The Converted Deacon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Converted Deacon for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Restoration (1910 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Restoration (1910 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 19:21, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Girls of the Ghetto
The article The Girls of the Ghetto you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Girls of the Ghetto for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 19:41, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:41, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Anime query
Hi, I don't want to pile on the agony but have just glanced through some recent contributions in case of a repeat of the Rationalobserver episode referred to in the current ANI thread re: KK87. Is this right? Is this, mentioned in external links, not a reliable source? Indeed, is the Japanese source that was actually cited reliable?

Is there some sort of "redirect to list" consensus, as there is for non-notable schools? If not, is there any point in redirecting, bearing in mind WP:NLIST and WP:V? They did remove the entry from the list. If it is acceptable then I can see us having redirects, for example, for every single crime genre, romance genre, historical genre, historical romance genre (!) novel etc that has ever been published.

Sorry to load all of these questions on you. I'm not familiar with the subject area but am aware that it has a lot of problematic articles. If your response to the first of my questions is "no" then there will be no need to respond to the others ;) - Sitush (talk) 06:49, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * It should probably gets its own article because it was produced and even picked up at a critical time in the industry then edited, redubbed and marketed by Kitty Media. Currently it is supposedly under Media Blasters - a complex history there. I am not sure why it is named in apparent homage to Megadeth's Symphony of Destruction. Don't get me wrong - notability is not of how important something is, but does enough proper sources exist to make an article. The key problems are a lack of development details and the subject matter (easy to cover up instead of fix). The ANN encyclopedia is not usually seen as a reliable source, but there is no doubt to the info. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:39, 29 May 2015 (UTC)


 * That's fine, thanks. If it should have its own article then the redirect needs to be reverted. I trust your judgement. - Sitush (talk) 14:58, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you, a lot of things are just a matter of who will do the work. Many of our long-standing yet ultimately redirected or deleted content falls into this place. Few people actually go through the trouble of creating useless and irrelevant articles. I found a review in Clements 3rd edition of AE. Clements is an apologist in many ways, but I am glad he cleared up in the last 5 years or so. Also... Knowledgekid thought the translator was vandalism... lol... didn't even check before removing. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * You might want to advise KK of the issue because I doubt I am flavour of the month. It looks like they'll have much more time to spend on articles soon. - Sitush (talk) 15:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Seems you are correct - I went to his page and saw him removing a ref because it was dead. Despite it being a redundant and easily replaceable. This is why I dislike WP:ANIME - people do not know the language and they care little because its "pop-culture"... its just not a fun place to edit. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Anime/manga means nothing to me, I'm afraid. Wouldn't stop me copyediting the occasional article, though, as I did for Herut yesterday ( also a topic area of no interest to me, although I did recognise a few of the names and that is more than I could say for anime!) I think the problem with a lot of pop-culture stuff, and especially the ones rooted in languages other than English, is that they attract fans who really do not know how this place works and very often do not care. There is no easy solution to that. I wonder if KK knows of the Wayback Machine - very useful for deadlinks. - Sitush (talk) 15:54, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Given how he didn't think about the context on the Miyazaki one... he is aware but lacks the comprehension of what it was even saying. I do a lot of older films and such - its a quiet environment and I know that this is a historical record of something which may be very unlikely to be "found". Wikipedia is less than 1% done... yet we fight about such stuff... wasting our time on simple things while more obvious flaws exist. Go figure. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:24, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote



 * Hello ChrisGualtieri:


 * This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 26 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 04:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of An Assisted Elopement
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article An Assisted Elopement you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DepressedPer -- DepressedPer (talk) 09:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ten Nights in a Bar Room (1910 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ten Nights in a Bar Room (1910 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DepressedPer -- DepressedPer (talk) 09:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Hold Me While I'm Naked
Hi. I've started this one. I'll be DYKing it, but I wondered if you wanted to further expand it and take it to GA?♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I have almost no idea on these different films and how to give them a better coverage suitable for listing at GA. I still want to focus on the Thanhouser films because they are still being discovered and are more accessible then others. I do not have the $1500 set of books about the D.W Griffith films for the Bioscope company. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * You can always request books through a wiki grant and not have to pay. Would you be interested?♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Didn't know that, but I haven't fully utilized the Macmillan books yet... I intend to make the most of such things if it costs money. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:27, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Yes, anything up to £2000 here. Mine was approved here. You just have to pay £5 to join WMUK. You could request books for silent films if you need them.♦ Dr. Blofeld  07:36, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Given that most of the articles will be of very low views - yeah, I don't entirely know if that'd be a worthy use. I have so much to do on the backlogs anyways. I was crushing the GAN section of the Wiki with the Thanhouser films. And if I was to do such a thing, it would be for Anime and Manga which gets hundreds of thousands of views. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lena Rivers (1910 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lena Rivers (1910 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:01, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Girl Reporter
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Girl Reporter you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:01, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Restoration (1910 film)
The article The Restoration (1910 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Restoration (1910 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:01, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lena Rivers (1910 film)
The article Lena Rivers (1910 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lena Rivers (1910 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:21, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of She Stoops to Conquer (1910 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article She Stoops to Conquer (1910 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:41, 2 June 2015 (UTC)