User talk:ChrisHodgesUK/Archives/2013

editing
I was trying to edit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Nobel_laureates_per_capita

addin Lithuania population 2,979,000 and lauretes 2, and per capita result 6.714, both numbers are from other articles of wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.60.49.75 (talk) 10:12, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * It seems like you were right, however it's a good idea to fill in the edit summary box. This is especially true when you're editing from an IP address, and also when you're making multiple edits that only make sense when the last one is saved. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 10:21, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I think I've fixed it now.ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 10:29, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

UK friend, simplifies your country page. before simplify this--Koldorogollo (talk) 17:33, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Ramdasia
Hello,

Can you keep a watch at the at the Ramdasia article page and provide your inputs if it should be merged with the Chamar page. The user Sikh-History is on an agenda has been constantly deleting sources and not providing reliable sources for his edits TimesGerman (talk) 13:11, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi TimesGerman. I've had a look, and I can see it's a bit of a mess, but without any knowledge of the topics there's not a lot I can do.  There's no merge request currently in place, and I would tend to oppose one at least at the moment as (1) There's no clear-cut reason for merging; and (2) Chamar is in much better condition, it's generally easier to merge articles of broadly similar quality. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 14:30, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Saraiki language
Dear, Saraiki is a language, it is not a dialect. Riasti dialect, Shah puri dialect, Multani dialect, Multani language, Thalochi dialect, Thalochi ,Derawali dialect articles. I suggest merging these articles, as the all these are same. And also be Redirected to Saraiki language. Also Jhangvi dialect is dialect of Saraiki. Kindly See these External Links #1 and #2.
 * Department of Saraiki, Islamia University, Bahawalpur was established in 1989 and Department of Saraiki, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan was established in 2006. Saraiki is taught as subject in schools and colleges at higher secondary, intermediate and degree level. Allama Iqbal open university Islamabad, and Al-Khair university Bhimbir have their Pakistani Linguistics Departments. They are offering M.Phil. and Ph.D in Saraiki. Five TV channels and Ten Radio Stations are Serving Saraiki language.182.186.47.188 (talk) 14:44, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi 182.186.47.188. Regardless of the merits of your argument,  a unilateral deletion of an article in favour of a redirect is not the way to approach this, and to be honest, my talk page isn't the place to sort it out (though you're welcome to make your point here of course).  I actually take no position on the appropriate article contents or title, I don't know enough to do so.  Please use the article(s) talk page(s) to discuss this, you may also find Template:Merge helpful.  ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 14:50, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for editing cellulitis
Thanks for removing the edit I made to the cellulitis page and wasting the time I invested in improving the page. I'm glad that your knowledge of cellulitis = ignorance. You say that I have no knowledge of the subject, yet as a serving Royal Marine who has undergone 3 weeks of treatment for Cellulitis, picked up on the training area of Woodbury Common I think my experience counts for more than that of a jobs worth! For information the citation - had you given me time would have been given to the Royal Devon & Exeter hospital, which diagnosed me, treated me and gave me the insight to the conidtion. In case you need this citation for the citation - They have leading microbiologist who specialises in Cellulitis & Royal Marines.

Ps You have re-affirmed my dislike for Wikipedia, as it is purely an 'elitist' forum rather than a resource for all to use and add to! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.130.49.226 (talk) 16:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for cleaning up the vandalism on my talk page. VMS Mosaic (talk) 16:30, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem - happy to help ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 16:39, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for corrections on "1985 "Aeroflot" Antonov An-12 crash" page. Andreb1 - February 3, 2011

Chris, Please leave my JKS post. It is constructive in a sense, factual, and I don't understand why you are removing it. Gary — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garyfeltman (talk • contribs) 14:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Gary. Your additions may have been everything you say, but it is not relevant to the article on Keystore, which JKS currently redirects to.  This is why I have removed it, and most editors would do the same. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 14:23, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for removing the edit I made to the cellulitis page and wasting the time I invested in improving the page. I'm glad that your knowledge of cellulitis = ignorance. You say that I have no knowledge of the subject, yet as a serving Royal Marine who has undergone 3 weeks of treatment for Cellulitis, picked up on the training area of Woodbury Common I think my experience counts for more than that of a jobs worth! For information the citation - had you given me time would have been given to the Royal Devon & Exeter hospital, which diagnosed me, treated me and gave me the insight to the conidtion. In case you need this citation for the citation - They have leading microbiologist who specialises in Cellulitis & Royal Marines.

Ps You have re-affirmed my dislike for Wikipedia, as it is purely an 'elitist' forum rather than a resource for all to use and add to! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.130.49.226 (talk) 16:39, 26 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry to hear you feel that way. It is a resource which all are welcome to add to, however for many reasons a citation to a reliable source is required.  You might like to see RS for more information about what constitutes a reliable source for these purposes.  If you have a news article for example which can be linked to, feel free to undo my edit and post the link - or let me know the link and I'll do it. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 16:45, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

I have better things to do with my time.. and no longer have any interest in contributing to Wikipedia, let alone using it! I would rather waste my time watching paint dry then spend time contributing only for it to be edited then told I have spend time to then look for articles.. Unlike some I have life which means I am not glued to the internet! Enjoy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.130.49.226 (talk) 16:48, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Apology and correction
Sorry my friend but on that article about the book of Abraham the mage you are mislead Abraham the Mage dates back to before humans barely after the first beginning and had seen atleast one of the ends of the world he made the codex in the beginning after the Yggdrasil was born but not century's after sorry for the rudeness but I have studied this for a long time and very in depth but I would like to see what you know of the subject of the elder age and all the ages to come –The Mortal Angel — Preceding unsigned comment added by MortalAngelFoxtrot (talk • contribs) 16:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Restored content on Bristol Rovers page
The women's section on the Bristol Rovers article was removed as Bristol Academy have no link with Rovers these days and haven't for a while. In fact, they've today announced that they have a tie in with Bristol City. Gasheaduk (talk) 13:58, 27 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi GasheadUK, I didn't know that, but it would seem reasonable to keep at least the {Main|Bristol Academy W.F.C.} link because of the historical ties. The original wording does say had a successful women's team so is still valid.  If you've got a reference (presumably the evening post would have something) to the link with City, then it might make sense to cut the section down to a sentence for historical reasons and add that link. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 14:06, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Afd or speedy for Anthony J. Fulton
Dear Chris, I am not sure if you noticed there is an Afd for this already. I am not clear about procedure here but have restored the Afd tag which the articles creator had deleted. Hope this is OK. Feel free to put back the speedy if you think this is better - I think it might be. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 18:25, 27 March 2013 (UTC))
 * Hi Msrasnw. I hadn't noticed a previous AfD, but there were a lot of edits to hide its deletion in. Although I think given the apparent conflict of interest a speedy may be in order, so long as its in a deletion process of some sort I'm not worried.  Thanks. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 21:24, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Apologies
I apologies for removing deletion tag from article [|ASSAR] I did it as per the instruction mentioned in it believing that citable references are increasing in ASSAR article: Abhijeet Sinha Sinha (talk) 17:37, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * OK - except you broke it rather than removing it. I see you've been adding references, but some of them appear to be to a website that matches your username.  It may be a good idea to read WP:RS and WP:COI before you put too much work in. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 17:42, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, ChrisHodgesUK. I just wanted you to know -- I've reverted your revert at ASSAR because this editor clearly indicates their intent to remove the PROD -- which is, of course, their prerogative. Of course, the newly added references were still invalid (and included some entirely false ones which moves the article closer to a hoax). So off to AFD it goes. Regards. —  Cactus Writer (talk) 19:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi CactusWriter - No problem, I appreciate the extra opinion, though I probably should have reverted my own revert after the discussion above. Thanks. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 21:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

I want to add my company in wikipedia
hi,i want to add my company in wikipedia can u do it for me or tell me the way how can i do it? i want to add a hosting company 'Global Hosting Service' Global Hosting Service.We are also providing Dedicated servers,Vps,Reseller hosting,Domain name registration,Domain name resellers,Seo services,Web development,Email&sms Marketing,Software development and Voip services. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PrinceCharming786 (talk • contribs) 13:51, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi PrinceCharming768. If you want to add a company you work for, the best way is to start something in your user space then ask ask for it to be created at wp:afc - that way an experienced editor can make a judgement as to whether the company is sufficiently notable to warrant an article. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 17:22, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Yes the Drillcat url you removed, it a hands on site that helps water projects world wide at not charge, also provide free hands on missionary drill training. It is a small site, but very revenant.
 * I had a quick look at the site and the most obvious thing about it was related to equipment sales. Looking though your history of adding this link I see I'm not the only one to think this: ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 17:24, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Also, as the external link name is very similar to the user name you have chosen, I suggest you look at WP:COI before adding links to it. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 17:25, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Noise music
I think the article should be changed to use the term 'noise' exclusively (not "noise music"). People in noise just say "noise." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.167.239.186 (talk) 16:02, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't personally have a problem with that (assuming that what you say is true), but if you want to change the notation used in the article, the article's talk page is probably the place to start - see if others interested in the topic agree. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 16:06, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Artice Writing Problem
Dear Admin When I Am Writing About A Famous Person In wikipedia. Wikipedia Is Not Accepting My Article its saying i am writing about my self Or My Biography but its not true i am not writing about my self i am writing about another famous person whose significance is important and genuine to be included in wikipedia my article page is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Sourabh_Kumar please verify that page and respond to me writing about a genuine person whose significance is important is the policy of wikipedia and only that i am doing but then also wikipedia is removing my article its worst you should accept it only the thing is i am not able to do citing and reference please give me the tutorial of citing and reference hope you will verify that page --Sourabh242 (talk) 07:32, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Post-policy party listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Post-policy party. Since you had some involvement with the Post-policy party redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). 168.12.253.66 (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks 168.12.253.66 - I've added my comment, but it's not that different to yours. I've never felt the need to propose deleting a redirect before - I tend to think that any halfway plausible redirect is worth having.ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 20:15, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Source for death
Hi, you said about not having a source for the death of Norman Jones (actor) there is no online source because he has not been acting for around 20 years. I know that he has died because he is a family friend!


 * Hi Calciumee, I'm sure you'll understand that we can't have unverifiable claims of death here, but in the meantime someone has found a source we can cite, so it's no longer an issue. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 11:05, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Women in China edit
Why was the change erased? Anyone who actually read the reference that was provided as a footnote would realize that the conclusion drawn was not what the wikiuser wrote. I corrected, removed, a piece of ideology that actually contradicted the conclusion in the footnote provided. This should be an issue of debate: a user stated something that was false and even contradicted by the source provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheMaxxx12345 (talk • contribs) 17:37, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The change was erased mainly because it was unexplained deletion of (apparently) referenced text. If you can explain the deletion (as you have done above) the best place to do that is in an edit summary, so that other editors can see what you did.  Alternatively there are templates that can be used to draw a readers attention to the fact that a source does not support a statement. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 17:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

The change was explained, and the citation was false. The changed was explained here, and on the page. This is besides the point that the change is accurate regardless of any preferred protocol on the site. A fact in an article is not subject to preference in protocol. This is wikipedia, there shouldn't be false information and a false citation, period. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.131.236 (talk) 09:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)