User talk:ChrisPopular46

March 2017
Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Santiago, Cape Verde have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 00:18, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Novo Caribbean


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Novo Caribbean, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Largoplazo (talk) 00:31, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Novo Caribbean, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 00:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Praia. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  19:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Santo Amadeus Do Encanto


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Santo Amadeus Do Encanto, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  AxG /  ✉  19:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. KylieTastic (talk) 19:50, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 22:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC)